TPR, EK, or TBR for Bio?

[csx]

---

Members do not see this ad.

There are some subjects I know a good amount about and need a little brushing up on. and a few I have no knowledge about (ie: anatomy).

I was thinking either going TPR and EK OR TBR only (I hear its kind of overkill).

thoughts? any other suggestions??

on a side note, how is the TPR SW,worth it? or are TBR passages better for practice?

any particular sections in any of the books that really "shine"?

 

[Sammy1024]

I think for content review EK is good. For practice I would use TPR because TBR has the worlds hardest Biol passages I've ever come across and don't represent the test.

 

[TexasSurgeon]

I think for content review EK is good. For practice I would use TPR because TBR has the worlds hardest Biol passages I've ever come across and don't represent the test.

TBR always has the hardest passages of them all. If you can do them you can do the others but yes I would say it's a bit unrealistic in terms of the MCAT. Just realize that TBR spends its time doing nothing but MCAT prep books

 

[Strudel19]

I read EK first, then read TBR. Personally, I don't like how EK is concise to the extreme. I guess I like how TBR is more of a story?

 

[clairephillips]

I read EK first, then read TBR. Personally, I don't like how EK is concise to the extreme. I guess I like how TBR is more of a story?

This is precisely why I like TPR. EK is too concise, TBR too wordy and difficult. TPR... JUST right, says Goldilocks.

 

[Qester]

I like TPR personally. I have read many people put down Ek1001 bio, but for the passages I did completed from that book I found very very useful.