TPRH VW Lacking

[MedPR]

---

Members do not see this ad.

Specifically lacking in questions regarding the author's tone and possible profession or point of view.

I thought those types of questions were pretty common on the real MCAT? I see a lot of "would most likely agree/disagree" and "would weaken/not weaken the argument" but very very few about tone and pov.

 

[MrNeuro]

yeah now that ive done some more EK i feel like the passage length of TPR VW and the questions in EK are much more similar to the MCAT

(took the mcat in january voided cuz i was still reviewing)

 

[MedPR]

yeah now that ive done some more EK i feel like the passage length of TPR VW and the questions in EK are much more similar to the MCAT

(took the mcat in january voided cuz i was still reviewing)

I haven't opened EK 101 yet. Planning on doing it all in the next 3 weeks.

 

[chiddler]

i've used both EK and TPR. i don't find that question very often.

 

[MrNeuro]

i've used both EK and TPR. i don't find that question very often.

dont you think though that most of the questions in EK are author-centric?

 

[chiddler]

dont you think though that most of the questions in EK are author-centric?

author centric? what do you mean

 

[MrNeuro]

author centric? what do you mean

has a lot more questions that require you to think more along the lines of what the author's thinking

i dunno maybe im just making things up

 

[chiddler]

has a lot more questions that require you to think more along the lines of what the author's thinking

i dunno maybe im just making things up

now that i think about it, yeah i guess it does.

not enough to cause concern, though.