I'm curious, to what extent do Psychiatrists work with transgender patients as attendings and during residency?
Obviously what happened at Hopkins with both John Money and Paul McHugh was egregious and bigoted (respectively), but Paul McHugh is like 80 and stuck in the Perspectives... he's not really academically relevant anymore, so I'm not sure why the media keeps asking for his opinion on Caitlin Jenner, bathroom laws, etc.
Actually I think these patients should have a full psych evaluation prior to gender affirming surgery though I don't think it should have to be with a psychiatrist, and in the same ways as say transplant evaluations, most of the time it is not a psychiatrist. a good social worker can probably do a better job of a thorough psychosocial evaluation than a psychiatrist. However there are cases where people who should not have had surgery who did. For example there was a prominent psychiatrist in the UK who lost his license after being overly eager to support patient's request for surgery which included a woman who had schizophrenia and a grandiose delusion she was jesus, prompting her wish for surgery. She was not actually trans at all (and she did get the surgery). I know someone who clearly has borderline personality disorder and frank identity diffusion - he had some surgery and then later decided he wanted to be a man again - probably should never have had the surgery because never truly identified as a woman but thought men were too misogynistic and had identity diffusion. Obviously there are a lot of trans people who are borderline but this was different. And of course very severe mental illness could impair someone's capacity to make an informed decision or have unrealistic expectations. So I think it can be useful -it's more the way that it is done. There should not unnecessary barriers but evaluation should support patient's autonomy to make authentic decisions consistent with their beliefs and values.That said, I think psychiatry needs to be cautious about how much we instigate ourselves into this issue (I don't think we need to at all). As Splik said, most patients should have access to a therapist with experience in this area specifically to guide them through the process, but I think doing things like "full psychiatric evaluations" prior to sex change surgery is unwarranted, stigmatizing, and almost draconian.
So are you just curious, or do you want to do this kind of work?I'm curious, to what extent do Psychiatrists work with transgender patients as attendings and during residency?
It's obvious the way McHugh writes that he's coming from a very biased position, but is there any good data supporting/refuting his claim that people who get gender reaffirming surgery don't get the... let's call it existential relief?... that they want from the surgery?
Because of specifics regarding the (admittedly small) cohort of trans people I have seen, I do worry that surgery for those (specific) patients may do more harm than good.
Yes, there's quite a bit. Of course, measures of QoL/psychological health in people who received this surgery are typically lower than the general population—but they're higher than their previous selves.
A few links:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1024086814364
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-010-9668-7
- "Participants (232 MTF transsexuals) reported overwhelmingly that they were happy with their SRS [sex-reassignment surgery] results and that SRS had greatly improved the quality of their lives. None reported outright regret and only a few expressed even occasional regret. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1158136006000491
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11314574
- The subjects proclaimed an overall positive change in their family and social life. None of them showed any regrets about the SRS.
https://www.skane.se/Upload/Webbplatser/USIL/Dokument/Sjukhusbibliotek/Johansson, Annika.pdf
http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/11758101
There's also a lot of evidence linking hormonal treatment and QoL/psychological functioning, etc. Obviously, not the same as surgery, but worth acknowledging. Example:
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11136-013-0497-3
Notably, rates of regret are extremely low.
I can understand why people are skeptical that sex-reassignment/gender-affirming surgery really helps people. But I think that, for many people, this indicates that deep down they really view transgenderism as a defense mechanism or something, where it's masking some deeper emotional conflict. (People used to think the same thing about LGB people too, but now we acknowledge there's nothing pathological secretly underlying LGB orientation and we just tell people to live their lives.) But all the evidence indicates that the problem is really quite simple: a person's subjective experience of gender is strongly and permanently different from the biological sex. And that's why surgery works.
Who is that a problem for? You or the person who is transgender?So the main problem with SRS and transgenderism is obvious, but not stated often enough-they are still their natural gender. If you are born male you will always be male and if you are born female you will always be female.
The vast majority of heterosexual people will not want to enter into an intimate relationship with someone of the same sex who has had surgery to be the opposite sex.
Splik's response in this thread was a little disappointing.
If you are in a private practice setting, and have a patient that is transgender who is going through hormonal treatment or gender reassignment surgery, I would recommend sending that patient to a university setting. During hormonal treatment, I've found it very difficult to control mood symptoms.
The vast majority of heterosexual people will not want to enter into an intimate relationship with someone of the same sex who has had surgery to be the opposite sex.
I can understand why people are skeptical that sex-reassignment/gender-affirming surgery really helps people. But I think that, for many people, this indicates that deep down they really view transgenderism as a defense mechanism or something, where it's masking some deeper emotional conflict. (People used to think the same thing about LGB people too, but now we acknowledge there's nothing pathological secretly underlying LGB orientation and we just tell people to live their lives.) But all the evidence indicates that the problem is really quite simple: a person's subjective experience of gender is strongly and permanently different from the biological sex. And that's why surgery works.
A lot of the people who specialize in things like this aren't going to be in a university setting(some are, some arent). I don't understand why anyone would be 'sent to a university setting to control mood symptoms'. Psychiatry is relatively unique relative to most other fields in this regard.
A lot of the people who specialize in things like this aren't going to be in a university setting(some are, some arent). I don't understand why anyone would be 'sent to a university setting to control mood symptoms'. Psychiatry is relatively unique relative to most other fields in this regard.
Thanks for the reading. It looks like--distilling things way down--early-onset TS and other general behaviors related to the (typical expression of the) desired gender/sex are important predictors of positive outcome.
I simply think it's a topic that requires a great deal of sensitivity but should also come with a great deal of skepticism--I can't think of any other psychiatric diagnosis (GID) for which we (currently) recommend a permanent physical alteration. Looks like actual rates of GRS are much lower than the general incidence of TG (from what I've seen) and patients who undergo GIS are probably significantly different from the TG patients I've seen in the context of (mostly consult/emergency) psychiatry.
Perhaps speaking to things being regional, the way people talk about this issue in my area (at least, those who claim to have relevant expertise an interest) is quite different from the idea of the psychiatrist having to act as a "Skeptic" who should "Recommend a permanent physical alteration". From a therapy standpoint, one should be prepared to help patients explore their own gender narratives, encouraging fluid expressions over time without a focus on reaching a point of absolute conviction regarding what their gender will be for the rest of their lives. In this frame, it is reasonable to help a patient explore the meaning of either hormone therapy or gender reassignment surgery, and not be in the position of having to recommend or permit these steps. Patients who are requesting hormone treatment or surgery do not need a recommendation from a psychiatrist, rather, and evaluation should focus on ensuring that the patients wishes are not the product of a psychiatric process, and ensuring that their desire to have the physical characteristics of the opposite gender is enduring.
This is an obvious false equivalence. If anyone can't understand why, please feel free to PM and I will explain it. It's sad and a little disconcerting that 4 people liked a post so lacking in logic. I hope it was based on ideology.So? The vast majority of heterosexual people don't want to enter into an intimate relationship with the vast majority of heterosexual people either. And yet the world spins on![]()
Can you address @birchswing then? His post says the same thing, really, but gets around this response of yours.This is an obvious false equivalence. If anyone can't understand why, please feel free to PM and I will explain it. It's sad and a little disconcerting that 4 people liked a post so lacking in logic. I hope it was based on ideology.
A lot of places have moved to having folks conduct these as forensic evals, if they have the resources. Though this practice is resource limited. A good forensic psychiatrist doesn't base the impressions on the one hour interaction.The thing about doing one off psych evals in people who really want surgery .... I'm not for it. I did bariatric evals at one point. And people you've never met who really want a surgery know what to say for an hour. It's really only over time that the red flags pop up.
This is an obvious false equivalence. If anyone can't understand why, please feel free to PM and I will explain it. It's sad and a little disconcerting that 4 people liked a post so lacking in logic. I hope it was based on ideology.
The university in my area created a special program for this disorder. Not all areas and academic settings will have it. But Jett is right, they do have hard to control mood symptoms.
this is a fair point....although when I think about it no reason the patient cannot see a community psychiatrist and their endo at a university medical center. I just found the idea that patients with 'hard to control mood symptoms' should be referred to a university medical center(for mental health treatment) insane.
No, it was a joke. If you need help understanding the finer points of witty comments, PM me. It's a little disconcerting that you missed it so completely. I'm assuming it was based on ideology.
In any case, your original post is the illogical one: you start by confusing sex with gender, and end (somewhat bizarrely) by implying that the sexual interests of heterosexual people are the final word on the ethics of SRS.
FYI, of the dozens of trans people I've met, about as many have been in relationships as the cisgender people I know. Often their partner is queer or also trans. Sometimes their partner is straight. A partner is a partner.
You're on the right track, in that patients are evaluated for capacity, and lack thereof precludes the surgery. There should not be a diagnosis or mental state that is an "exclusion criteria" beyond presentations that render them incapable of demonstrating capacity.If I was requested to do a psychological evaluation for a transgender surgery, I would have a difficult time stating that they could not make this decision for themselves so long as they have decision making capacity and if they lacked that capacity, then it would be up to a court to determine them incompetent. Which diagnosis or mental state should be an exclusion criteria? I guess there could be concerns such as a patient with Borderline PD that might change their mind a month later. (Oops, too late. 😱) Should that really be our decision and why?
Specialized programs will offer more resources for them to engage with than just a generalist due to the specific nature of the illness.
this is a fair point....although when I think about it no reason the patient cannot see a community psychiatrist and their endo at a university medical center. I just found the idea that patients with 'hard to control mood symptoms' should be referred to a university medical center(for mental health treatment) insane.
I think there's a community assumption that you get the best medical care (including psychiatric care) at your university training center. Not really true, but an assumption.
I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you are not trolling (though the necrobumping a thread about something quite different, and stating that homosexuality is a choice are red flags). However it is obvious that you aren't a psychiatrist and don't understand what words like delusion mean or what depression is, and if it was an innocent question, it is not entirely unreasonable (assuming you not a physician or medical student).I'm necroing this thread because I felt the topic has more substance and warrants more discussion than what was covered before it died. Specifically, I would like to know why transgender is not considered a delusion.
An earlier poster brought up a good point: your sex is your sex, with or without surgery. Your sex cells and genes do not change because your genitals have changed. This is contrasted with homosexuality which simply begins and ends as a choice -- a preference. You either prefer red grapes or green grapes, you either prefer male partners or female partners. You cannot argue the pathology of preference.
But transgender is more than a preference; it is a belief about ones self.
I've also read the comparison with people suffering from depression: they recognize their life is great, but their internal and mental outlook is inconsistent. The individual outwardly recognizes reality, but their belief about reality is to the contrary. Despite being fundamentally based in the same breakdown of reality versus perception, depression is treated as an illness, while being transgender is not.
If a male patient comes in and claims they believe they are the son of God, therapy is (hopefully) aimed at correcting this belief. If a male patient comes in and claims they believe they are a woman, we defer to their judgment because "gender is in the mind." But then again, so is a belief in being the son of God.
My post won't be nearly as interesting as @splik 's, but I'll reply nonetheless: when was the last time you chose your preference for anything? That is, did you choose to prefer red grapes, or did you discover that you simply do prefer them and therefore choose to eat them? Choice and preference are 2 very different things. Preference often influences choice, but that doesn't make them the same.This is contrasted with homosexuality which simply begins and ends as a choice -- a preference. You either prefer red grapes or green grapes, you either prefer male partners or female partners.
My post won't be nearly as interesting as @splik 's, but I'll reply nonetheless: when was the last time you chose your preference for anything? That is, did you choose to prefer red grapes, or did you discover that you simply do prefer them and therefore choose to eat them? Choice and preference are 2 very different things. Preference often influences choice, but that doesn't make them the same.
You're right. I wrote that very late at night. "Choice" was a poor ... choice of words. No one chooses their preferences.
.
No, it doesn't follow unless you are confusing preference with behavior.If you don't believe that sexuality is a binary, then it seems to me that it logically follows that there can be at least some component of choice.
no this conflates attraction and sexual behavior. you don't choose who you are attracted to, or who you fall in love with, but you do choose who you have sex with. also choice is not necessarily biologically determined, there is also social determinism (which plays a huge role in shaping desire and attraction) as well as psychic determinismI think that it shouldn't matter whether homosexuality is a choice or a preference. It was convenient in the 90's-00's to push it as a biological predisposition because that's more convincing when arguing for equal social/legal treatment. If you don't believe that sexuality is a binary, then it seems to me that it logically follows that there can be at least some component of choice.
No, it doesn't follow unless you are confusing preference with behavior.
no this conflates attraction and sexual behavior. you don't choose who you are attracted to, or who you fall in love with, but you do choose who you have sex with. also choice is not necessarily biologically determined, there is also social determinism (which plays a huge role in shaping desire and attraction) as well as psychic determinism
While most preferences are probably not chosen, I think, to at least some degree, you can choose to influence your own preferences and your preferences can change due to life experiences. Examples: I now prefer IPA's but that's partially because I chose to drink enough IPA's to start to appreciate them, but I didn't prefer them initially. As another example, I don't think it's uncommon for some people to have changes in who they're attracted to after trauma.
Recognizing my own potential ignorance, maybe there's a more specific/strict definition for the term "preference" when using it in a psych. context?