- Joined
- Mar 5, 2012
- Messages
- 266
- Reaction score
- 190
Has anyone on this board transitioned back to OR anesthesia after practicing 100% pain for a while? Any regrets in doing so?
I sent you a PM.
Depends on the hospital system. Many are getting stricter and stricter (not just anesthesia but other specialities)Would appreciate if someone could comment on this publicly instead of by pm's.
My question: if I do 100% pain for say three years after fellowship and want to get back in the OR, can I get credentialed? What would I need to do to get back in there? Is there some kind of refresher or proctorship?
i would be happy to not provide any hospital any peds numbers.. Luckily I had done 150+ over my first 9 months in practice. I would assume you'd have to be proctored for 100 peds cases if you didn't meet their requirement.
\.
Unless u are workin for the "man" in pain. It's very hard to start your own pain practice from the bottom up.Is pain reimbursement that bad these days?
Is pain reimbursement that bad these days?
That's what she said...If you goose the tube just remember to leave it in so you don't go in the wrong hole again...
Sounds rough. Here I was thinking pain was one of the last few havens in medicine, right up there with derm, GI, etc. Seems like the opioid epidemic has ruined the field. Handing that stuff out like candy for decades was bound to catch up to us eventually. Guess I'll stick to the OR if I even go the gas route at all. Still not sure.The compensation isn't the problem. You can make a lot of money in interventional pain, if you're in private practice. I know plenty of interventional pain physicians in private practice who make over $650,000/yr. The issue is HOW you make the money in this setting. The patients, with the notable exception of cancer patients and elderly/normal folks with isolated complaints (e.g., tennis elbow or lumbar radiculopathy), are absolutely draining. They suck the life out of you and are a source of burnout. Probably 50% of the patients have fibromyalgia or an undiagnosed central pain disorder, which is either overlooked or sub optimally treated. These patients are terrible candidates for interventional pain procedures. The majority of patients are on systemic opioids, even though 90% of these patients should NOT be on opioids. Good luck weaning them off. Many of the referring providers think it's a good idea to put patients on BOTH benzos AND opioids. It's a constant battle to get patients off the benzos and opioids, and annoying as hell to deal with. Imagine arguing with 10 patients a day about this very issue. It gets old quickly. You constantly have to worry about patients doing something stupid and overdosing, even if you take every reasonable precaution against this possibility. The failure rate for procedures in benign pain is unacceptably high, unlike the procedures for cancer pain. Dealing with third party payers is a royal pain in the ass. All of them have different local coverage determinations for procedures. Denials for care are commonplace and, in many cases, random. Documentation requirements are absurd. On top of all this joy is a systematic "milking" of the system by unethical physicians (obviously not everyone but more common than you might think), who are doing everything they possibly can to get rich off of patient care. It's basically the equivalent of being a glorified salesperson. Bad news.
It's just an absolute mess in private practice. Maybe it's different in integrated health care systems (I hope it is, anyways). Academia is definitely a different environment, but then you have the publish or perish dynamic.
The compensation isn't the problem. You can make a lot of money in interventional pain, if you're in private practice. I know plenty of interventional pain physicians in private practice who make over $650,000/yr. The issue is HOW you make the money in this setting. The patients, with the notable exception of cancer patients and elderly/normal folks with isolated complaints (e.g., tennis elbow or lumbar radiculopathy), are absolutely draining. They suck the life out of you and are a source of burnout. Probably 50% of the patients have fibromyalgia or an undiagnosed central pain disorder, which is either overlooked or sub optimally treated. These patients are terrible candidates for interventional pain procedures. The majority of patients are on systemic opioids, even though 90% of these patients should NOT be on opioids. Good luck weaning them off. Many of the referring providers think it's a good idea to put patients on BOTH benzos AND opioids. It's a constant battle to get patients off the benzos and opioids, and annoying as hell to deal with. Imagine arguing with 10 patients a day about this very issue. It gets old quickly. You constantly have to worry about patients doing something stupid and overdosing, even if you take every reasonable precaution against this possibility. The failure rate for procedures in benign pain is unacceptably high, unlike the procedures for cancer pain. Dealing with third party payers is a royal pain in the ass. All of them have different local coverage determinations for procedures. Denials for care are commonplace and, in many cases, random. Documentation requirements are absurd. On top of all this joy is a systematic "milking" of the system by unethical physicians (obviously not everyone but more common than you might think), who are doing everything they possibly can to get rich off of patient care. It's basically the equivalent of being a glorified salesperson. Bad news.
It's just an absolute mess in private practice. Maybe it's different in integrated health care systems (I hope it is, anyways). Academia is definitely a different environment, but then you have the publish or perish dynamic.
The definition of pain medicine: Patients come to see you and let you stick needles in them in the hope that you will refill their Oxycontin prescription.
Every practicing pain doctor knows this simple fact but some are living in denial and won't admit it.
Something I've been wondering about. I'm seriously considering a pain fellowship but I'm wondering if it's a "grass is greener" situation. My program has a significant portion that goes into pain every year (20-30%) and subsequently it looks like a great route, especially after some of our residency issues.
As an intern, I had a private practice pain rotation that was almost purely interventional. Of course there was some medication management, but the vast majority of clinic was either diagnosing patients and setting up a procedure or follow-up appointments. Patient's that broke their pain contracts were discharged, no questions asked. Patients that wouldn't follow recommendations as far as cutting back on narcotics while trying procedures and PT were often sent back to their PCP. (I know how that sounds, but what more can you do for a patient that doesn't agree w/ your plan?). Is this sort of practice not commonplace?
Let me ask you something.You should definitely be cautious when it comes the "grass is greener" phenomenon. In principle, interventional pain medicine should be an amazing subspecialty.
If you could somehow start or join a practice that is:
1. truly multidisciplinary (physical therapists with expertise and experience treating chronic pain patients, a well-trained and ethical chiropractor, a talented acupuncturist, massage therapy, and pain psychology)
2. highly selective in terms of what patients the practice takes on long term, filtering out all drug seekers, "chemical copers," and patients with centralized pain disorders and/or axis II disorders, only leaving "normal" chronic pain patients who just want to become more functional and contribute positively to society
3. highly restrictive vis-a-vis systemic opioid prescriptions, limiting them to cancer pain, acute/subacute postoperative pain, and the occasional 70+ year old elderly person with particularly severe, NSAID refractory degenerative joint disease all over the place that you can't realistically treat with interventional pain procedures effectively
4. divorced from third party payers, who increasingly view interventional pain procedures as "investigational" and are trigger happy when it comes to denials of care, even if care is pre-authorized
5. profitable despite being ethical, multidisciplinary, and (highly) opioid restrictive
then, yes, interventional pain would be a dream. Highly predictable schedule. No weekends, no nights, no in house call. No emergencies. High income. Fun procedures and satisfied patients.
The problem is that reality is a far cry from the ideal in interventional pain. Truly multidisciplinary practices are not that common, except in a few high end private practices and academia. For the most part, private practice is the polar opposite of multidisciplinary, simply because of the high cost of maintaining all of the ancillary services such as PT, pain psych, massage, etc. It eats into the bottom line and requires a very high volume of interventional pain procedures to maintain. In addition, the selectivity on the front end is a double-edged sword. In the long term, it will result in a great patient population that you not only can help but also enjoy treating. However, it's a recipe for pissing off referring providers. If you reject half the referrals from a PCP (or whomever), don't be surprised when your referrals from that doc mysteriously disappear. It's ridiculous, but it's reality. With respect to highly restrictive opioid prescribing habits...plan on arguing with patients every day, multiple times a day about why opioids are bad for them long term (dependence, tolerance, addiction, hyperalgesia, endocrine disturbances, societal consequences, activity restrictions, etc. etc.) and that, believe it or not, the doctor who was previously prescribing them oxycontin, oxycodone, AND benzos for benign pain was doing the WRONG thing. It's draining. After you do it a few hundred times, it gets old. "Chemical copers" are EXTREMELY common in pain medicine and, unfortunately, many doctors outside (and inside) the field of pain medicine have fostered this mentality over the years.
Finally, it would be amazing to be divorced from third party payers for reimbursement. There are so many enormous advantages to it: more face time with patients, far less time devoted to extraneous documentation requirements, higher profit margins because you can run a much leaner operation overall without staff devoted to billing, more freedom in procedural options, etc. The list goes on and on. The problem is that this model of care, which is known as concierge medicine or direct pay, is not being done routinely in interventional pain. Primary care, orthopedics, derm...yeah, but not interventional pain. It's hard to venture into this territory when you have a wife, children, and $250,000 of educational debt.
Just my $0.02 as a burnt out interventional pain physician (who initially was very excited about a career in pain medicine).
You just excluded 95% of all chronic pain patients!2. highly selective in terms of what patients the practice takes on long term, filtering out all drug seekers, "chemical copers," and patients with centralized pain disorders and/or axis II disorders, only leaving "normal" chronic pain patients who just want to become more functional and contribute positively to society
I have a solo pain practice. Desirable location. Dog comes to work everyday. Own the building. Zero narcotics. 8-5 m-thurs. No nights. No weekends. Never see the inside of a hospital. Haven't been to a work dinner in a decade. Good pay. 100% autonomy.
Just another point of view.
I have a solo pain practice. Desirable location. Dog comes to work everyday. Own the building. Zero narcotics. 8-5 m-thurs. No nights. No weekends. Never see the inside of a hospital. Haven't been to a work dinner in a decade. Good pay. 100% autonomy.
Just another point of view.
I have a solo pain practice. Desirable location. Dog comes to work everyday. Own the building. Zero narcotics. 8-5 m-thurs. No nights. No weekends. Never see the inside of a hospital. Haven't been to a work dinner in a decade. Good pay. 100% autonomy.
Just another point of view.
Yes u can. The millennia generation wants everything NOW. Generally those born after 1980 are the millennia generation.Only difference though is that you clearly started during the "good times" for pain. Starting a practice from scratch today takes atleast 300k, as stated above and you can't do it in desirable locations.
Yes u can. The millennia generation wants everything NOW. Generally those born after 1980 are the millennia generation.
.
So how is the DEA not on these guys' arses?The challenge is growing the practice in an ethical way. I know all the local pain doctors and volume is directly proportional to sleeziness.
So how is the DEA not on these guys' arses?
Bc it's not just opiate scripts that he's referring to. BS blocks to maximize billing w/o any improvement in patient care
It is possible to start a pain practice on a low budget. Unless you're hanging a shingle in an area with no established pain doctor, I don't think that the initial volume justifies the expense of a procedure suite with C-arm.
I started with a sublease on unused medical office space from another doctor, free EMR, and one medical assistant. Fluoro procedures can be done in an ASC (or hospital when required by specific insurance). Billing outsourced for 5% of collections. Made my own website with Wordpress, printed up some brochures. Use my personal laptop and bought a cheap computer and a printer/fax for the MA. The other doctor had an ultrasound machine that I borrowed, otherwise this would be the most significant initial expense. About $400/mo on Google Adwords, no other paid marketing. Wrote a few medical articles for the local newspaper for free publicity. I did some lunches for local PCP's in the first year. Also met the local surgeons, but in my experience all they care about is how many patients you send them. The spine surgeons near me are like clockwork; if I refer them a patient who gets scheduled for surgery, the next week they send a referral back. They don't care how good or ethical you are.
There are some good online articles about medical micro-practices, which tend do be primary care practices, but the model works with Pain also.
The challenge is growing the practice in an ethical way. I know all the local pain doctors and volume is directly proportional to sleeziness. Accordingly my growth has been slow and I don't have much advice in this department. The ratio of patients to pain doctors in my area is too high for anyone to maintain a full-time non-narcotic practice. If you're in a saturated area, the best way to practice pain, both financially and for your sanity, is probably part-time in combination with part-time work in an OR.
So how is the DEA not on these guys' arses?
Or how about forming a separate anesthesia company and hiring a Crna to give propofol for all your cases then keeping 50% of the anesthesia collections.
...Prepare to get burglarizedAnother sleezebag move is to open your own "In house" pharmacy and say patients can fill scripts in office for cash.
No board certification requiredIs board certification a job requirement for some places? My residency program happily employs many non boarded anesthesiologists.
Is board certification a job requirement for some places? My residency program happily employs many non boarded anesthesiologists.
Must be a lenient academic program. Most major universities give non boarded (even from own program around 3 years and they are gone).No, we had a non-boarded CT guy who had been out for 5 yrs at my program. After 9 months and a number of serious clinical and interpersonal issues he was told to either leave or get fired. We also had a number of young staff who hadn't taken or successfully passed the written or oral exam within a few years of graduation. I became board certified before a couple of the new staff I had as a CA1.
Must be a lenient academic program. Most major universities give non boarded (even from own program around 3 years and they are gone).
That is very lenient. My community hospital will toss out anybody not BC in their primary specialty within 5 years.
No regrets at all. PM if you have specific questions.Has anyone on this board transitioned back to OR anesthesia after practicing 100% pain for a while? Any regrets in doing so?
I forgot two more sleeze bag moves.
The sleezebag Doctor gets a speaking honorarium from a drug company of 2k per engagement. That Doctor then becomes the largest prescriber of drug X. Doctor collects honorarium every time the drug rep comes to the office and brings lunch. Doctor collects honorarium fee for every dinner and lunch they give in community. Now drug X costs ten times what a generic drug of similar efficacy costs but who cares.
Another sleezebag move is to open your own "In house" pharmacy and say patients can fill scripts in office for cash.
I know that these threads can get long and hard to read, so if the op or anyone else has specific questions, I'd be happy to try to answer.
I did two years in private physician owned pain practice after fellowship. Got back into anesthesia by spending 3 years at an academic center where I did one day per week in the or. Now doing private employed practice, one week in clinic, one week in or. I love it.
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk