if someone develops unprovoked dvt while has an ivc filter in place and assuming no migration and intact filter. Whats purpose of treating dvt since it technically wont get to lungs? Would you still put in anticoagulation?
if someone develops unprovoked dvt while has an ivc filter in place and assuming no migration and intact filter. Whats purpose of treating dvt since it technically wont get to lungs? Would you still put in anticoagulation?
if someone develops unprovoked dvt while has an ivc filter in place and assuming no migration and intact filter. Whats purpose of treating dvt since it technically wont get to lungs? Would you still put in anticoagulation?
if someone develops unprovoked dvt while has an ivc filter in place and assuming no migration and intact filter. Whats purpose of treating dvt since it technically wont get to lungs? Would you still put in anticoagulation?
I had a patient a couple of years ago who developed descending bilateral venous thrombi from his IVC filter downward. He presented in shock because he had such little venous return that he was in a low-flow state. As others have stated, IVC filters have some utility in the short term but cause massive problems in the long term.
Including migration into the aorta which I just finished talking to a vascular surgeon about.
That's bad, right?
Including migration into the aorta which I just finished talking to a vascular surgeon about.
It actually migrates/erodes into the surrounding structures (as opposed to floating downstream and through the heart). You can see in the image below where it has made it into the small bowel (asterisk in pictures 5/6/7/8) and the aorta (black circle in image 7/8).How did an IVC filter get past the pulmonary capillaries? VSD?