- Joined
- Dec 15, 2005
- Messages
- 16,429
- Reaction score
- 25,051
A question for the group.
I've been mulling this over for a while because of some recent annoyance with my civilian-land insurance plan. Today's United Health CEO news jogged my memory and I figure I might as well reach some conclusions and make a decision. I feel a little bit silly as a doctor 20+ years out of school but confused by health insurance. 🙂 I would appreciate input.
I'm retired from active duty, and eligible for Tricare. We're enrolled in Tricare Select. Just my wife and I.
I also get insurance (United Health) through my private practice group. About $580 comes out of my monthly draw to pay for it. The group pays the other 3/4 of the premium. I'm a partner, which means in the grand scheme of things, I'm paying for the other 3/4 of the premium also. (Sort of - if I opted out, I'd save $580/month, and that 3/4 would go into the group's general account, for which I'd receive some bit of at a later time when the books are zeroed.)
Kids are in their 20s. Two are on the United plan with us, but will come off late in 2025. Youngest daughter is finishing grad school and will get a job with benefits (I hope). Middle son will turn 26, and will get his own policy.
Between my PP income and Navy retirement, I'm making $7-800K/year so the United premiums are not a huge burden, but I hate paying money for something I don't need ... and I especially hate paying money for something that doesn't actually deliver the benefit I thought I was paying for:
Recently United Health denied coverage for a medically-indicated but not urgent surgery for my wife (reduction mammoplasty). Apparently that specific CPT code is specifically excluded by the particular plan our group has. I think one secretary thought it was lumped in with other "medically-necessary" but actually "kinda elective" procedures like bariatric surgery. An appeal from the surgeon's billing office with additional documentation was denied. Beyond being annoyed, I mostly just shrugged because the office said Tricare Select covers it and she'll get it done anyway in a few months.
All this has led me to ask myself why we would want to pay for United once we have no need of a family plan. Tricare premiums are dirt cheap. So cheap, that they might as well be free. In 20+ years on active duty, Tricare never said no to us about a claim. I know they reimburse terribly, so there exist practices which don't accept Tricare or limit their number of Tricare patients. Access to non-emergent and specialty care could conceivably be an issue with only Tricare, but it appears that acceptance of Tricare is not a significant problem locally. We aren't in a military town and I'm going to guess very few people around here have Tricare.
My wife and I are about 50, and healthy. I take no meds. She's on a HTN med and a statin, and honestly is on the edge of not needing them at all.
So, to get to the point. My questions for the group:
What is the real-world value to having the non-Tricare insurance? Is it worth paying ~$7-8K/year for it?
If you're retired and still working full time, what do you do and why? Tricare only? Tricare plus an employer / PP group plan? Just the employer/group plan?
Thank you for educating and advising me.
I've been mulling this over for a while because of some recent annoyance with my civilian-land insurance plan. Today's United Health CEO news jogged my memory and I figure I might as well reach some conclusions and make a decision. I feel a little bit silly as a doctor 20+ years out of school but confused by health insurance. 🙂 I would appreciate input.
I'm retired from active duty, and eligible for Tricare. We're enrolled in Tricare Select. Just my wife and I.
I also get insurance (United Health) through my private practice group. About $580 comes out of my monthly draw to pay for it. The group pays the other 3/4 of the premium. I'm a partner, which means in the grand scheme of things, I'm paying for the other 3/4 of the premium also. (Sort of - if I opted out, I'd save $580/month, and that 3/4 would go into the group's general account, for which I'd receive some bit of at a later time when the books are zeroed.)
Kids are in their 20s. Two are on the United plan with us, but will come off late in 2025. Youngest daughter is finishing grad school and will get a job with benefits (I hope). Middle son will turn 26, and will get his own policy.
Between my PP income and Navy retirement, I'm making $7-800K/year so the United premiums are not a huge burden, but I hate paying money for something I don't need ... and I especially hate paying money for something that doesn't actually deliver the benefit I thought I was paying for:
Recently United Health denied coverage for a medically-indicated but not urgent surgery for my wife (reduction mammoplasty). Apparently that specific CPT code is specifically excluded by the particular plan our group has. I think one secretary thought it was lumped in with other "medically-necessary" but actually "kinda elective" procedures like bariatric surgery. An appeal from the surgeon's billing office with additional documentation was denied. Beyond being annoyed, I mostly just shrugged because the office said Tricare Select covers it and she'll get it done anyway in a few months.
All this has led me to ask myself why we would want to pay for United once we have no need of a family plan. Tricare premiums are dirt cheap. So cheap, that they might as well be free. In 20+ years on active duty, Tricare never said no to us about a claim. I know they reimburse terribly, so there exist practices which don't accept Tricare or limit their number of Tricare patients. Access to non-emergent and specialty care could conceivably be an issue with only Tricare, but it appears that acceptance of Tricare is not a significant problem locally. We aren't in a military town and I'm going to guess very few people around here have Tricare.
My wife and I are about 50, and healthy. I take no meds. She's on a HTN med and a statin, and honestly is on the edge of not needing them at all.
So, to get to the point. My questions for the group:
What is the real-world value to having the non-Tricare insurance? Is it worth paying ~$7-8K/year for it?
If you're retired and still working full time, what do you do and why? Tricare only? Tricare plus an employer / PP group plan? Just the employer/group plan?
Thank you for educating and advising me.