- Joined
- Feb 23, 2011
- Messages
- 121
- Reaction score
- 0
True or False:
When T is increased, Keq always increases.
why?
ty~~~~~~
When T is increased, Keq always increases.
why?
ty~~~~~~
sorry for replying on my own post, but I'm thinking that the answer is false, because Keq depends on if the rxn is exo or endothermic.
R -> P + heat (exothermic)
R + heat -> P (endothermic)
R= reactants
P= products
So, if T is increased for both reactions, rxn 1 will not be favored, and rxn 2 will be favored. Does this mean Keq1 is decreased and Keq2 is increased?
Here, I treat heat as a product or a reactant, but I also know that products do not change the equilibrium constant, though they do change the final concentrations.
But we know that Keq is changed by Temperature!!! ahhhh!
Thanks for the clarification guys,
One more..
T/F:
There exists a reaction where with the addition of heat, no change in Keq will be present.
Here, I treat heat as a product or a reactant, but I also know that products do not change the equilibrium constant, though they do change the final concentrations.
Thanks for the clarification guys,
One more..
T/F:
There exists a reaction where with the addition of heat, no change in Keq will be present.
If the reactant and product are of equal energy and equal entropy, then in theory it could be true. Consider the ring flip process for cyclohexane. The two conformers are identical in energy and entropy, so no matter how much you heat the system or cool the system, Keq will always be 1. While this isn't exactly a reaction, the ring flip process can be described as an equilibrium process and assigned a Keq. You will always have equal parts of the two ring structures, although the reality is that you can't distinguish one from the other, so this is purely an exercise in thought and not practice.
That's interesting. By the way, I read somewhere that at room temperature, there's an energy barrier of about 11 kcal/mol between two chair conformations of cyclohexane. Not sure how I remember that or if it's even important to know, lol. Regardless though, I understand the point you were making 😛