- Joined
- Mar 23, 2008
- Messages
- 222
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 4,596
- Fellow [Any Field]


thas about dead on...according to the MSAR (which is where the data from that selector spreadsheet came from).
Your numbers are off. The numbers from US News (2007):
Total: 6582 applied, 695 interviewed, 335 were accepted, 172 enrolled
IS: 473 applied, 102 interviewed, 70 were accepted, 36 enrolled
OOS: 6109 applied, 593 interviewed, 265 were accepted, 136 enrolled
Your numbers are off. The numbers from US News (2007):
Total: 6582 applied, 695 interviewed, 335 were accepted, 172 enrolled
IS: 473 applied, 102 interviewed, 70 were accepted, 36 enrolled
OOS: 6109 applied, 593 interviewed, 265 were accepted, 136 enrolled
thanks chad, I can always count on you.
The US News book provides the accepted and enrolled totals?
Your numbers are off. The numbers from US News (2007):
Total: 6582 applied, 695 interviewed, 335 were accepted, 172 enrolled
IS: 473 applied, 102 interviewed, 70 were accepted, 36 enrolled
OOS: 6109 applied, 593 interviewed, 265 were accepted, 136 enrolled
Woah thats awesome information. So the 335 accepted include from the WL? Do you happen to have Creighton's?
Can anyone please give me those stats?
I looked at the School Selector spreadsheet and it said like 1100 people interviewed and only 172 acceptances - that can't be right!?!?
where are you finding the # of people accepted to a certain school?
I'm not sure about the book. These came from the online guide (it's $14.95 for access for a year).
Anyone know if Tulane is a closed file interview? The 2007 interview feedbacks say yes, but the 2008 ones don't say.
I called a few days ago and was asked to hold, but the lady didn't actually put me on hold, she just put the phone down while she waited for someone to bring her some coffee with sugar. She sounded like she really needed it. It was funny.
Yeah, 335 accepted does include those that were waitlisted.
Creighton
Total: 5433 applied, 593 interviewed, 340 were accepted, 126 enrolled
They don't have the IS and OOS data except that 14 IS enrolled and 112 OOS enrolled. Sorry.
Hey Chad any chance you can give me GW's stats? Pretty please?
Hey Chad any chance you can give me GW's stats? Pretty please?
lol i wonder if usnews would have some issue with that
Unfortunately I can't do this for every school. In order to get the information you really need to just buy the subscription. I don't mind doing it for a few schools here and there, but I can't dispel all of this information for free that everyone else has to pay for.I'm just going to cut to the chase: Chad, can you post the stats for every US allopathic school?
Unfortunately I can't do this for every school. In order to get the information you really need to just buy the subscription. I don't mind doing it for a few schools here and there, but I can't dispel all of this information for free that everyone else has to pay for.
It's only $15. Compared to the cost of primary and secondary applications, and then travelling to interviews. It's a drop in the bucket. It's cheaper than the MSAR, too. 👍
does anyone know if those "applicant" figures from US News represent the amount of people that applied from the primary application or the amount of applicants that actually finished a secondary? From what I have read, a lot of people don't finish all the secondaries of schools they listed in their primary app.
Thanks in advance!
whoa, wait a minute. Of course the accepted number will be greater than the matriculated number reported in the MSAR, but the MSAR has the number of interviews granted at nearly twice the number the USNews stats you provided does (1100+ vs 600+). Whats the deal with that discrepancy?
Unless, is it 600ish interviewed but not accepted, and the sum of the interviewed+accepted+matriculated were all interviewed?
No one knows? Surely the MSAR can't be off by 500+. IF it is, I want my $$ back...