When the pandemic was at it’s worst and the ICU was flooded and like a war zone almost every single patient that needed to be intubated was unvaccinated.
www.bbc.com
I’m mean this basically sums it up:View attachment 363947
Any thoughts on this data set from the CDC?
Why Do Vaccinated People Represent Most COVID-19 Deaths Right Now? | KFF
This post explores why the share of COVID-19 deaths among those who are vaccinated has risen, Factors include a rising share of the population that is vaccinated, waning immune protection and low uptake of boosters, and changes in immunity among the unvaccinated.www.kff.org
View attachment 363947
Any thoughts on this data set from the CDC?
Why Do Vaccinated People Represent Most COVID-19 Deaths Right Now? | KFF
This post explores why the share of COVID-19 deaths among those who are vaccinated has risen, Factors include a rising share of the population that is vaccinated, waning immune protection and low uptake of boosters, and changes in immunity among the unvaccinated.
There is no telling how many cardiologists called something demand ischemia instead of dealing with it during COVID and then the person died.Another thing you never hear from the “Covid not that bad, live your life, fygm” people is any concern about all the pts with non-covid diagnoses who had their care affected.
April 28, 2021 – Results from a retrospective observational study, presented today at Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) 2021 Virtual Scientific Sessions, reveal a 70% decline in the number of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during April 2020 compared to April 2019. While the number of patients with AMI seeking care at hospitals dropped during the pandemic, those that did receive care experienced more severe symptoms because of delays in patients seeking emergency services.
COVID Caused Major Decline in Heart Attack Patients Seeking Care
April 28, 2021 – Results from a retrospective observational study, presented today at Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) 2021 Virtual Scientific Sessions, reveal a 70% decline in the number of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) during April...www.dicardiology.com
As a result of system- and patient-level factors related to the COVID-19 pandemic, cancer care has frequently been delayed or altered. For example, recent data showed that half of European breast centers altered systemic treatments during the pandemic and one-fifth of patients experienced delay in radiation therapy
Factors Associated With Cancer Treatment Delay Among Patients Diagnosed With COVID-19
This cohort study assesses the associations of patient factors and social determinants of health with the risk of treatment delay in patients with cancer who contract COVID-19.jamanetwork.com
Great article worth reading. Thanks for posting.View attachment 363947
Any thoughts on this data set from the CDC?
Why Do Vaccinated People Represent Most COVID-19 Deaths Right Now? | KFF
This post explores why the share of COVID-19 deaths among those who are vaccinated has risen, Factors include a rising share of the population that is vaccinated, waning immune protection and low uptake of boosters, and changes in immunity among the unvaccinated.
I doubt he will. He kinda is trapped using his own company. Also, he will likely be in jail soon (well…a guy can dream).
While losing 100 billion dollars. In the grand scheme of things, he is still not suffering but people who are trying to defend his decisions amaze me.
www.bloomberg.com
It's not only the journalists fault but many of modern journalism is trash. Need more independent instead of people writing for clicks and being afraid of cancelled
Can you be more specific? What specific decisions are you talking about? (And to be clear, I am NOT referring to individual tweets. In my mind, those aren't "decisions".)While losing 100 billion dollars. In the grand scheme of things, he is still not suffering but people who are trying to defend his decisions amaze me.
Elon Musk's 2022 Wealth Loss Exceeds $100 Billion for First Time
Tesla co-founder’s fortune has plunged as shares of the electric-car maker tumble.
The “smart” CEO’s just “donate” to politicians to support their views.
If he let reporters in to look at the internal discussions and workings of Twitter why was he firing people for leaking info he didn't like? Or is it only a fantastic decision when it supports a favorable narrative?
My impression was that he was firing people who were toxic to the ideas he wished to bring to the company. Getting the right people on the bus, as they say in the business world. If you have someone who is actively engaged to go against what your goals are for the company, it is best to part ways. That toxic environment created by the employees working to undermine the new boss is very unlikely to be able to be repaired. Addition by subtraction. That is not an uncommon tactic. I am an outsider to Twitter, but it seemed that Twitter was loaded with employees who were against any ideas that Musk had and seemed very vocal about it. If that happened at Toyota or GM or some other big company, people would see it as reasonable for a new boss to bring in his own people to carry out the new ideas. Even happens in large healthcare systems. If there is a new CEO for a healthcare system, most of the c-suite are at very high risk.
Yup. He fired near 75% I heard and Twitter is running better. Don't docs loathe useless admin and bureaucrats? Where's the consistency? Twitter has also rolled out new features faster than ever before, again with tons for fluff staff gone.
Musk rats?
I think Musk was referring to prosecuting him for lying during a congressional hearing under oath. Is that what you are talking about or was it about something else?
www.krisinformation.se
Okay, let's stay on task here.Leaked email shows Musk threatened to sue Twitter employees who leak to media
Musk email complains of "many detailed leaks of confidential Twitter information."arstechnica.com
Multiple other sources echo the sentiment. Does that strike you as someone who wants to be open and honest about the inner workings of his new company? Or was he only revealing what he wanted to deploy a narrative the right was looking to confirm?
Meanwhile, in sane western countries where things like covid policy aren't based on own-the-MAGArats vs. own-the-libs and big pharma doesn't have absurd influence...
At the moment, there is no clear evidence to support giving a second booster dose to people below 60 years of age who are not at higher risk of severe disease. Neither is there clear evidence to support giving early second boosters to healthcare workers or those working in long-term care homes unless they are at high risk.
To prevent one COVID-19 hospitalisation over a 6-month period, we estimate that 31 207–42 836 young adults aged 18–29 years must receive a third mRNA vaccine. Booster mandates in young adults are expected to cause a net harm: per COVID-19 hospitalisation prevented, we anticipate at least 18.5 serious adverse events from mRNA vaccines, including 1.5–4.6 booster-associated myopericarditis cases in males (typically requiring hospitalisation).
Who will be vaccinated when?
If you live in Sweden you will be offered free Covid-19 vaccination. You do not need to be a Swedish citizen to get the vaccine.www.krisinformation.se
Children and young people
The recommendation to vaccinate children 17 or under expired on October 31 2022. From November 1, vaccination against covid-19 is recommended only for special groups of children.
I agree with your sentiment that they (the CDC) is overstating the data to help big pharma. However, I disagree with your sentiment ("how they concluded is not clear to me.." - it is VERY CLEAR to me why they concluded this. They are not scientists anymore. That is the ONLY reasonable and logical conclusion. They are serving another master, and it isn't randomized trials, or best observational data.
Haha nope! I learned a long time ago to know when I’m being asked an unreasonable task or assignment.
Yep, masks and vaccines work. Apparently, medications also work to help treat diseases. I did learn some things in med school.
Fair enough.
When we went to med school we were explicitly taught that surgical masks were useful for preventing droplet contamination of surgical fields only. Proper respiratory precautions required fit-tested N95 respirators. It was literally a point of pride for attendings to point out staff wearing surgical masks (why they were called surgical masks) in situations where respiratory precautions were required and re-educate them that what they were wearing was useless. This is the same thing Fauci said at the beginning of the pandemic -- that there's no point in wearing surgical masks to try and protect yourself as that is what we always knew and had been taught for these kinds of viruses. Then suddenly overnight the "science changed." Even though nothing changed other than the need to appear to be doing something. Come on, dude. We all saw it with our own eyes. Nothing changed.
www.nature.com
You haven't moved to Florida yet?Current rules and recommendations
These are the advice and recommendations in effect regarding Covid-19.
UPDATED 20 DEC 2022 17:15
Covid-19 is no longer generally dangerous or dangerous to society
From 1st April onwards, Covid-19 will no longer be classified as a generally dangerous illness or a danger to society, the Swedish Public Health Agency has stated. However, infection tracing will still take place in in-patient care where there are people at high risk of becoming seriously ill.
God damn it. It must be so nice to live in a non-clown state.
www.factcheck.org
Hey Vecna, did you see who is head of bioethics at NIH?The fact that people think the NIH clearly, directly funded gain of function research and that Fauci knowingly lied under oath about funding it is a delusion so absurd that's it's on a level with Q.
Ultimately, it's a convenient political target where conservatives don't care about the veracity of the claim or any of the nuances or context involved in the story.
The Wuhan Lab and the Gain-of-Function Disagreement - FactCheck.org
A disagreement between Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Anthony Fauci has put $600,000 of U.S. grant money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology back into the spotlight, while making "gain-of-function" research a household term -- all amid calls for more investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV-2.
You may want to read the deposition Fauci gave recently.The fact that people think the NIH clearly, directly funded gain of function research and that Fauci knowingly lied under oath about funding it is a delusion so absurd that's it's on a level with Q.
Ultimately, it's a convenient political target where conservatives don't care about the veracity of the claim or any of the nuances or context involved in the story.
The Wuhan Lab and the Gain-of-Function Disagreement - FactCheck.org
A disagreement between Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Anthony Fauci has put $600,000 of U.S. grant money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology back into the spotlight, while making "gain-of-function" research a household term -- all amid calls for more investigation into the origins of SARS-CoV-2.
It's funny you throw that accusation around considering that 1. Multiple expert virologists are in disagreement with each other regarding whether EcoHealth's work constituted GOF research, and 2. Even if they were engaging in GOF research, EcoHealth didn't disclose to the NIH that some of their research didn't wasn't outlined in their initial grant proposal, ergo Fauci wasn't knowingly lying under oath about anything.
If that is true, he cannot claim that there is zero percent chance that COVID came from a lab (which her said multiple times). Both can’t true.
He never said there was a "zero percent chance." In fact, he was quite explicit that the chance was non-zero
On the topic of lying:
Fauci getting excoriated by Rand multiple times during senate hearings was great entertainment and a real life example of how many of the conversations on these threads would go if they happened in person.He never said there was a "zero percent chance." In fact, he was quite explicit that the chance was non-zero
"Fauci: “I have always said that the high likelihood is that this is a natural occurrence. I didn’t dismiss anything, I just said it’s a high likelihood that this is a natural occurrence from the environment of an animal reservoir that we have not yet identified. And I still maintain that.“But, as I just mentioned as a response to other questions, that since you don’t know 100% about that — because no one knows, including me, 100% what the origin is — is the reason why we’re in favor of further investigation.”"Rubio Questions Fauci on Why He Downplayed COVID Lab Release Theory in 2020
Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Marco Rubio questioned Dr. Fauci about why he downplayed the theory that COVID-19 originated in a lab at a Senate Committee on Appropriations Hearing. See below for a lightly edited transcript and watch the video here. Rubio: “I want to go through what we...www.rubio.senate.govAnthony Fauci, the retiring top official in the United States response to the Covid-19 pandemic, said Sunday he has “a completely open mind” about the origins of the respiratory virus.“I have a completely open mind about that, despite people saying that I don’t,” Fauci said, when asked on NBC’s “Meet the Press” about the theory that the virus may have leaked from a lab in China in 2019.Fauci on Covid lab leak theory: ‘I have a completely open mind’
He also criticized China's Covid-19 response as “shutdowns without a seeming purpose.”www.politico.com
