- Joined
- May 30, 2002
- Messages
- 99
- Reaction score
- 1
I have two questions about UCLA/Caltech MSTP for any veterans who've interviewed/been accepted there or have done some research about this program.
1. It seems to me that this program would rank among the top MSTP programs in the country, considering that Caltech is a number one graduate school for most sciences and UCLA medical school is among the top in funding and highly regarded. Do you have any idea how people in academic medicine would compare the strength of this program to that of other top MSTPs like Harvard/MIT, UCSF, WashU, Hopkins? Are there any differences prestige-wise in academic medicine?
2. Do you know anything about in-house admissions (IE applying to UCLA/Caltech MSTP as a UCLA MS1 or MS2)? Considering how there are only two seats offered per year for the Caltech option, would in-house candidates have to rely on one of these two people dropping the program, or is there some flexibility with regard to adding on another well-qualified student to the program? This seems somewhat problematic to me, since a MS1 applying in-house is effectively applying for an MSTP class that was already chosen in the previous year's application cycle. My gut feeling is that UCLA/UCLA (UCLA PhD) would be more flexible in adding a UCLA medical student to the MSTP program, since there are both more positions (and more chance of cahdidates dropping out) and it's UCLA's call and doesn't involve a second institution which may have its own limitations/requirements. I know this is a specific question about a specific program--but any tangential advice about this is welcome... even in regard to in-house admissions in general or at other MSTPs.
Thanks!
1. It seems to me that this program would rank among the top MSTP programs in the country, considering that Caltech is a number one graduate school for most sciences and UCLA medical school is among the top in funding and highly regarded. Do you have any idea how people in academic medicine would compare the strength of this program to that of other top MSTPs like Harvard/MIT, UCSF, WashU, Hopkins? Are there any differences prestige-wise in academic medicine?
2. Do you know anything about in-house admissions (IE applying to UCLA/Caltech MSTP as a UCLA MS1 or MS2)? Considering how there are only two seats offered per year for the Caltech option, would in-house candidates have to rely on one of these two people dropping the program, or is there some flexibility with regard to adding on another well-qualified student to the program? This seems somewhat problematic to me, since a MS1 applying in-house is effectively applying for an MSTP class that was already chosen in the previous year's application cycle. My gut feeling is that UCLA/UCLA (UCLA PhD) would be more flexible in adding a UCLA medical student to the MSTP program, since there are both more positions (and more chance of cahdidates dropping out) and it's UCLA's call and doesn't involve a second institution which may have its own limitations/requirements. I know this is a specific question about a specific program--but any tangential advice about this is welcome... even in regard to in-house admissions in general or at other MSTPs.
Thanks!