Well first of all I'd like to thank you for taking the time and explaining everything in details
I really appreciate it!
Let me say that your point is valid 100% especially about choosing the cheapest. Honestly, that was all I can think of at the beginning. Now that I made my final decision, let me explain.
My decision was based on a lot of reading from the forum's archives about the same dilemma I had starting from the year 2003 up till that moment, also I spoke to graduates/current students from every program, did simple calculations and some speculations into the future
.
About UCLA: It's a state school, $60,000 cheaper, P/F, high specialization rate... BUT:
- State school means that it WILL be forced into the huge budget cuts adopted by the UC system due to the rough economy we're facing (specially Cali) that means more staff lay offs, worn facilities, get less education for the same amount of money
- The P/F system helps a lot with specialization BUT now that the boards are P/F as well, a lot of doubts are surfacing on whether the committee will still need some numbers to look at
- The "UCLA has more chances in getting into a PG program" saying is just a gimmick, they both have the same exact chances of getting in (at least 1 Pacific grad is accepted into UPENN's endo program each year!!!!)
- LA is just a beautiful city! I loved it the most, even more than SF. If both programs were equal to me or very close, I would've definitley chosen UCLA just for the city! But that's not the case, it's a huge investment and I should make sure that I make the best out of it during those 2 years!!
- UCLA has this persisting problem of poor patient pool. Being in Westwood and having USC closer to those under-served lower level neighborhoods, it makes sense!
- Going through all the drama to get a chair, butt-heading with the residents to get cases as they are ahead of you in line, mind you the complex cases!!!
On the other hand, Pacific:
- It's a private school, which means way superior facilities specially the clinics and equipments, more "laid back" attitude through the school, no budget cuts
- do complicated cases like rehabs, place implants from scratch, do more surgical procedures, make invisaligns
- $60,000 (28%) more expensive...but let me get to that point later
- Brand new clinics! I'm talking EVERY SINGLE THING will be brand new!!!!! Also they redesigned the clinics layout to be more like several small private practices. The first year will be in the old bldg, the second will be in the new one. So far the school claim that they have everything under control and will do the transition during the summer 3-4 wks vacation so I shouldn't be worried. The 2 bldgs are 15 mins apart which is not that bad if I stayed in my old apratment in the 2nd year
- Only ortho RESIDENTS on board!!! that's a HUUUUGE PLUS!! Can you imagine that? Can you imagine how many cases you'll get to do? The exposure you'll get, all the complicated treatment plans and simply get the chance to practice each and every procedure that out there in any book!
Now... my 2 cents
-When I go to Pacific, I'll pay 28% more fees, but I will get better facilities, clinical exposure, far superior clinical training and more GP focused program with a very strong endo course....
-If I'm gona go to UCLA then I'll pay less, have hard times keeping up with the clinical requirements, have the risk of 10% tuition increase, have less value for the money, have tiny risk to stay behind another quarter, amazing social life and city but less time to spend going out due to lack of time....
Since I'll be my own boss eventually, it won't matter where I graduated from... If I was a business student and will be hired and looked at by other people, then I would've definitely went to UCLA without even considering ANYTHING else, because each employer will train me differently anyway
back to dentistry
bottom line is:
Should I pay $60,000 less and have to spend another 1-2 years in residency programs to get "enough" experience to jump in the market? This means ANOTHER loan (which is almost as equal to the old one) for the residency program with interest kicking in once you receive the money PLUS the accumulating interest from the older loan!! Do you think all this will not make the $60,000 difference?!!! guess not!!!
With that being said, you actually get LESS value for the money at UCLA than PACIFIC.... or at least that's how I look at it!!
In addition to the way I have my priorities listed... the program is what I'm looking/paying for, the city, weather and everything else is not as important at all! And honestly, it's still San Fran!!! I mean come on
Since UPENN & UCLA are very close (actually UPENN is slightly better clinically) I would still choose UCLA because of the city!