-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
UCSF rejection
Started by coco85
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
UCSF is the frontier, when it comes to rejecting people.
They interviewed me last year with lower DAT stats. This year, I improved my DAT and I had an overall stronger application. Yet, they rejected me without even interviewing me
So.. if my stats suck compared to yours, should I just wait for a rejection? It seems like they forgot about me -- haven't heard anything at all. Ohh well. They were my "reach" school anyway.
At least you haven't had a rejection yet!So.. if my stats suck compared to yours, should I just wait for a rejection? It seems like they forgot about me -- haven't heard anything at all. Ohh well. They were my "reach" school anyway.
You never know. Last year they interviewed me with a DAT of 19, and this year they rejected me with a DAT of 22

At least you haven't had a rejection yet!
You never know. Last year they interviewed me with a DAT of 19, and this year they rejected me with a DAT of 22
So weird!
It's San Francisco! Comon, you HAVE to expect things to be a bit cooky.
On a serious note, I think UCSF is a school that looks "beyond the dat".....
I'm a walking proof of that 🙄
On a serious note, I think UCSF is a school that looks "beyond the dat".....
I'm a walking proof of that 🙄
