- Joined
- Feb 27, 2008
- Messages
- 19
- Reaction score
- 0
Trying to understand Phase II block by sux a little better. I know that phase II block occurs with repeated or extended periods of sux application in which the nerves become repolarized but desensitized and produce a twitch response identical to that of non-depolarizers.
My question is more clinical. How does a patient present when he's in phase II block? Texts say that phase II block manifests with tachyphylaxis (requiring increased doses to illicit the same response) and that increasing doses of sux would be required to maintain paralysis. However, if the nmj is desensitized to sux AND ACh, then wouldn't the patient still be paralyzed despite being unresponsive to sux? Since the patient is not responsive to ach as well, the patient would still not be able to move?
In other words, if I'm noting tachyphylaxis by requiring to increase sux, it means I want the patient paralyzed. Firstly, how would I know that I need increasing doses of sux unless the patient is moving/breathing/showing signs of movement unless that patient is reacting to ACh? But since in phase II block, the nmj is insensitive to ACh, that shouldn't be the case!
Confused...
My question is more clinical. How does a patient present when he's in phase II block? Texts say that phase II block manifests with tachyphylaxis (requiring increased doses to illicit the same response) and that increasing doses of sux would be required to maintain paralysis. However, if the nmj is desensitized to sux AND ACh, then wouldn't the patient still be paralyzed despite being unresponsive to sux? Since the patient is not responsive to ach as well, the patient would still not be able to move?
In other words, if I'm noting tachyphylaxis by requiring to increase sux, it means I want the patient paralyzed. Firstly, how would I know that I need increasing doses of sux unless the patient is moving/breathing/showing signs of movement unless that patient is reacting to ACh? But since in phase II block, the nmj is insensitive to ACh, that shouldn't be the case!
Confused...