- Joined
- Oct 22, 2017
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
Beware before making your rank list. This program is officially on probation.
Beware before making your rank list. This program is officially on probation.
A 75% failure rate speaks more about the quality of the residents, not necessarily the program.Interviewed there last week. I spoke to one of the CA2 residents afterwards. I was told only 3/12 of their residents passed their basic exam. Also residents spoke to a lack of teaching at a number of the sites. Resident told me they do not expect the program to be around after this year and that residents may have to transfer to a hospital near the Canadian border.
I do not disagree with either statement, and if we truely believe in patient advocacy, we need to keep resident standards high all around. We all know how quickly a situation can deteriorate in an OR. Would you want these people taking care of you or your family members?A 75% failure rate speaks more about the quality of the residents, not necessarily the program.
This is the future of anesthesiology; all the losers who can't make it into better specialties will apply for anesthesiology to escape family practice.
Interviewed there last week. I spoke to one of the CA2 residents afterwards. I was told only 3/12 of their residents passed their basic exam. Also residents spoke to a lack of teaching at a number of the sites. Resident told me they do not expect the program to be around after this year and that residents may have to transfer to a hospital near the Canadian border.
How does one calculate "inflation adjusted" USMLE scores FFP?A 75% failure rate speaks more about the quality of the residents, not necessarily the program.
This is the future of anesthesiology; all the losers who can't make it into better specialties will apply for anesthesiology to escape family practice.
My "inflation-adjusted" USMLE scores from 10-15 years ago would be North of 260 today. It pains me to see people with scores of 210-220 today even considering an anesthesiology residency.
This one looked at the almost 20 point-increase in the minimum passing score (at least for Step 1), and at the frequency of certain high scores. For example, 15 years ago, a 260 was a superstar. A white crow. Today, one keeps hearing about 260 scores (at least on Step 2), at about the same frequency as 240s back then. The average is at least 10 points higher, for both steps.How does one calculate "inflation adjusted" USMLE scores FFP?
Quite simple, you just need the old data (mean and standard deviation). A person at the 90 percentile score back in 2008 got 250, in 2016 he would get 255. Can't find older data, but if you just look at the mean you will not do a very accurate comparison.How does one calculate "inflation adjusted" USMLE scores FFP?
I found some better data. https://www.med-ed.virginia.edu/handbook/pdf/usmle2-00.pdfQuite simple, you just need the old data (mean and standard deviation). A person at the 90 percentile score back in 2008 got 250, in 2016 he would get 255. Can't find older data, but if you just look at the mean you will not do a very accurate comparison.
A 75% failure rate speaks more about the quality of the residents, not necessarily the program.
This is the future of anesthesiology; all the losers who can't make it into better specialties will apply for anesthesiology to escape family practice.
My "inflation-adjusted" USMLE scores from 10-15 years ago would be North of 260 today. It pains me to see people with scores of 210-220 today even considering an anesthesiology residency.
This is very curious. Look closely at the OP's name, then go to the SUNY Upstate Anesthesiology website and look at some names. Not sure what is going on, but I feel like there are some shenanigans.