- Joined
- Jan 17, 2005
- Messages
- 128
- Reaction score
- 0
Which do you choose?
willthatsall said:I'd go to Minnesota... Guess it depends on where you want to live though. I loved the Twin Cities when I visited. Vermont is...Vermont.
Well, I guess she put you in your place. Though I believe excellent is probably a bit more exclusive than including Vermont.nona1 said:you're wrong- Vermont has an EXCELLENT reputation.
YzIa said:Though I believe excellent is probably a bit more exclusive than including Vermont.
If every medical school with a solid/good reputation (with or without national recognition - in this case without) was considered to have an excellent reputation, then 75% of medical schools would fit into that category. Excellent in my eyes should be more exclusive that that. Consider the midwest for example, I have heard different people (SDNers, fellow applicants/interviewees, or physicians) say that the following are excellent programs or have excellent reputations: UChicago, NWU, Loyola, Rush, UWisc, MCW, UIowa, UM-TC, Mayo, UMich, Case, Ohio State, Indiana, Wash U, and SLU.snapdad said:Why?
Merits such as: Minnesota will probably offer better opportunities in research if you are interested in that, and you will have a wider variety of patients (and hospitals) in your clinical years being located in the Twin Cities vs. Vermont. Your first two years will vary by the schedule and methods of teaching, but you will learn the same material. Matching wise, you will match better in the midwest from UM, and probably better in the northeast from vermont.nona1 said:Ah, thank god I'm not in my early 20's and dealing with 21 year old boys any more.Any other opinions on the actual merits of the schools themselves? Don't want to be sidetracked with random analogies to sports...
Good enough for me.nona1 said:Let's kiss and make up... 😍 😀
nona1 said:Which do you choose?