Unmatched positions (prob. filled now)

  • Thread starter Thread starter dave262
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
D

dave262

List of Unfilled Programs 2006
National Resident Matching Program Page 1 of 39
NRMP CODE QUOTA MATCHED NRMP CODE QUOTA MATCHED
* Uses ERAS for Scramble

Copyright National Resident Matching Program
ANESTHESIOLOGY

CALIFORNIA
UC SAN FRANCISCO-CA
Anesthesiology 1062040A0 22 21
ACGME: 0400521023
Tel: (415)476-3235
Email: [email protected]
Fax: (415)514-0185

CONNECTICUT
U CONNECTICUT HLTH CTR
Anesthesiology 1094040A0 6 5
ACGME: 0400821172
Tel: (860)679-3600
Email: [email protected]
Fax: (860)679-1275

FLORIDA
JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSP-FL
Anesthesiology/Pediatrics 1104040C2 2 1
ACGME: 0401121036
Tel: (305)585-6973
Email: [email protected]
ILLINOIS

RUSH UNIVERSITY MED CTR-IL
Anesthesiology 1147040A0* 8 6
ACGME: 0401621043

IOWA
U IOWA HOSP/CLIN-IOWA CITY
Anesthesiology 1203040A0* 3 1
ACGME: 0401821049

KENTUCKY
U KENTUCKY MED CTR
Anesthesiology 1848040C0* 9 2
ACGME: 0402021052
Tel: (859)323-5956 x 80070
Email: [email protected]

MARYLAND
JOHNS HOPKINS HOSP-MD
Anesthesiology 1242040A0 14 13
ACGME: 0402321058
Tel: (410)955-7609
Email: [email protected]
Fax: (410)955-5607

MISSOURI
ST LOUIS UNIV SOM-MO
Anesthesiology 1365040C0 10 5
ACGME: 0402821166
Tel: (314)577-8750
Email: [email protected]
Fax: (314)268-5102

NEW YORK
NASSAU UNIV MED CTR-NY
Anesthesiology 1448040A0 1 0
ACGME: 0403511094
Email: [email protected]
SUNY UPSTATE MED UNIVERSITY
Anesthesiology 1516040A0 10 9
ACGME: 0403521113
Tel: (315)464-4899
Email: [email protected]

OHIO
MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF OHIO
Anesthesiology 1579040A0* 4 3
ACGME: 0403821125
Email: [email protected]

WASHINGTON
VIRGINIA MASON MED CTR-WA
Anesthesiology 1756040A0 4 3
ACGME: 0405412162
Tel: (206)583-6079



There ya go folks.... Good thing I matched. Jeez, competitive year.
 
Can anyone log in and post the CURRENT list... post-scramble?
 
UTSouthwestern said:
Here ya go:
I don't understand why UCSF went unfilled?!
 
The unbolded sections are from the other thread on this topic. They can make all the rationalizations and excuses they want but basically the point is every program and PD whats to fill their class every year PERIOD. As was said elsewhere, why put a position in the match that you don't "care" about filling because your ucsf. Ha! Did MGH, BID, etc follow this "strategy". No because besides being elite programs they are also nice places to work and live. Enjoy the embarrassment ucsf.


I can actually understand ucsf not filling. My interview day was a very negative experience. I absolutely hated it and the leadership or lack thereof within the program. They blackball residents and push residents out who don't score high enough. All that crap about "not leaving senior elective scheduling up to residents because its too important" is just crap. The real reason they do that is because they NEED those senior residents in certain rotations to cover those cases. Also, perhaps not everyone going into anesthesiology wants to hear about how anesthesiology will be dead in 15 years and we should all be spending our time taking over the ICUs. Talk about a place out of touch with the mainstream private practice model. Also, living in san fran isn't exactly an appealing idea to anyone with less than a six figure income. Oh well, even after interviewing at 14 programs, the only program I didn't rank at all was ucsf, fwiw.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Originally Posted by MD/TX2006
just wondering... but do you think that UCSF would rather not match that one position since they have 21 filled?

VM wouldn't have that luxury for sure...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


I would imagine given my impression from my interview day there that that will be the ucsf party line. Unfortunately, that's baloney. Why would you put a position into the match if you didn't "care" about filling it? If they had out of match people or mdphd folks wanting to fill in the program they would have taken care of that ahead of time. My personal opinion is that like blaze said they probably got an inflated image of themselves given the general competitiveness of this year's applicants and got caught not ranking enough people. Oh well.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by ripped cheese
i did an away rotation at ucsf and after talking to rosen and miller, both said that they only rank people who they want in the program. miller also said that if they didn't fill the numbers (like this year's case), they would not scramble in anyone.

good luck to that class. they already work to the bone, and one less resident can't help.


------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exactly as what I was concerned about with their program.

The program knows that the residents are overworked and yet they have this attitude of "even if we don't fill we will not scramble in anybody."

Just as I had heard and suspected. Are they saying that pd's and chair's at other programs are ranking applicants that they wouldn't want but because their ucsf they don't have to do that? Ha! Same attitude, same story that ive heard from multiple people about ucsf. Screw over the entire entering resident class by not filling or scrambling work hours be damned!
 
The secret is officially out. All I can say is that im glad I got in when I did.

Congrats to all my new collegues.
 
Ha ha! Wouldn't interview me and then they ended up 1 short. ha ha. Serves them right.
 
Top