Those numbers for private schools are crazy. Especially when you consider that about 20 % of the class has no debt at all and thus skews the averages...
Yup. It's one thing if it's a private, top-tier medical school where one has a slew of research opportunities at your disposal, has every single residency/fellowship available, ability to connect with big-wigs who can write fantastic LORs, etc. thus making it completely worth it for the applicant. In those cases, it's an academic smorgasbord.
https://services.aamc.org/tsfreports/report.cfm?select_control=PRI&year_of_study=2014
BU has absolutely
no business charging higher tuition and fees than Harvard.
Same for SLU vs. Wash U.
Same for Meharry vs. Vanderbilt.
All this, when the first 2 years are relatively independent study (due to an explosion of test prep resources), where the physical diagnosis course leaves much to be desired, M3 has become much less hands-on and students are much more (maybe too much) protected from what residency will really be like, simulators are taking the place of real patients, etc.
Nerd alert -- I like looking at the tuition in prior years and then using the inflation calculator:
http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl to see what it actually should be now, inflation adjusted.
So as an example, in 1996-1997, tuition at Wash U was
$27,435 per year, which should be
$40,688 dollars per year in 2014, adjusted for inflation.
Wash U in 2014 actually charges
$54,050 per year, thus charging
$13,362 more per year ($53,448 more total). I mean what exactly is that difference going to, and can we really say that med students now are being educated better, to justify that huge cost increase?