Urgent question about my major!

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

DVMDS

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
36
Reaction score
13
After careful evaluation, I realized I didn't want to be a biology major at my university because the department is awful. I have a passion for history and making it to veterinary school. So I have a history major now with a biology minor. I am taking all the classes I need to for vet school and I plan on becoming a tech before actually applying. Am I screwing myself over by not working toward a science degree? Any advice will help.
 
After careful evaluation, I realized I didn't want to be a biology major at my university because the department is awful. I have a passion for history and making it to veterinary school. So I have a history major now with a biology minor. I am taking all the classes I need to for vet school and I plan on becoming a tech before actually applying. Am I screwing myself over by not working toward a science degree? Any advice will help.

Short answer: No.

Study something you love, because once you hit vet school (while you may love the classes), it's gonna be a whole lotta science. As long as you complete all the pre-reqs (and do well in them) for whatever school you plan on attending, you're golden.
 
Thank you so much, truly.
 
Nope, shouldn't affect your chances at all. As long as you get the prereqs and your experience, your major really really doesn't matter. I was a psych major, bio minor, and I'm currently a vet school first year!
 
You're not screwing yourself over, no. I have a theology degree with just the pre-reqs to vet school bolted on.

But I have to admit, I don't understand the undergrad -> vet tech -> vet school route. Why spend the extra time and money to become a vet tech? It will just increase the amount of educational cost (and/or debt) and reduce the amount of time you can spend recouping that cost as a vet.

(Before someone leaps down my throat, that's not a shot at vet techs. If you want to become a vet tech, become one. If you want to become a vet, do so. But you don't become an RN in order to become an MD, and similarly I see zero reason to become a CVT to become a DVM.)
 
I doubt she meant she is going to tech school, but rather is getting a job at a clinic before applying (which for most school is practically required). She probably, like myself, also lives in an area where the common language doesn't distinguish between assistants and techs. I could probably find plenty of people in this area that would tell me a vet assistant is a higher position than a vet tech (in the human world physician assistants are above nurse and techs.) She'll probably learn by the time applications come around to put assistant down on her application to make sure it doesn't hit a nerve with any adcoms.

Side note: I have an International Studies degree (political studies/business/language).
 
I doubt she meant she is going to tech school, but rather is getting a job at a clinic before applying (which for most school is practically required).

To be clear to those just starting on this path, getting a job at a clinic is certainly not required. Thousands of hours of experience is also not required. What is viewed favorably (and what I've been told by every adcom I've ever asked) is the variety and depth of experience that gives you perspective into what the field entails. One could make an argument that the person with 5000 hours at the same small animal clinic and nothing else has less perspective into the veterinary profession than someone with 50 hours in each of equine, food animal, small and research.

In short, even bypassing tech school but still planning on getting a job as a tech/assistant/whatever after school at a clinic could be a waste of time and resources. Instead, volunteer on the weekends or on school breaks with different vets in different fields.
 
One could make an argument that the person with 5000 hours at the same small animal clinic and nothing else has less perspective into the veterinary profession than someone with 50 hours in each of equine, food animal, small and research.

In short, even bypassing tech school but still planning on getting a job as a tech/assistant/whatever after school at a clinic could be a waste of time and resources. Instead, volunteer on the weekends or on school breaks with different vets in different fields.

This is thoroughly going to be dependent upon which school is applied to as well. Some schools like to see that breadth and others like to see depth. Also, no school is going to think 50 hours in each of equine, food animal, small and research is a lot of experience or gives that person a great view on the profession. That is equal to working one week in each area. Just about every school would like to see depth in at least one area (over 200 hours I would say is a minimum, but 500 hours is more on line with average). I am not saying you can't get accepted if you have less experience or only 50 hours in each area, it is just really not that great of a number of hours unless you have a stellar GPA to back it up. If you are applying to somewhere like UPenn, having just 100 hours here and there will not impress them, but some other schools may appreciate that. You have to balance out what you have done and experiences you have obtained with which schools you apply to. If you have a lot of depth of experience, apply to places that like to see depth; if you have more breadth, apply to places that like breadth.


I also disagree with the poster saying that being a vet assistant is similar to being a physician's assistant.... that is a laughable comparison. A physician's assistant has gone through school and can even write some prescriptions.... a veterinary assistant does not come close in comparison. Just because they both end with assistant does not make them equal. I don't think tech school is a good idea for someone who wants to be a vet, in the end. Just gives you more debt. Working in a clinic can give you a good insight into the profession and how to relate to techs/assistants/receptionists/etc. If you are going to work in a specific area of vet med though, it would be wise of you to do as 2CatMatt was saying, and try to shadow/volunteer once or twice a week in a different area or aspect of vet med. I don't agree that having 5000 hours in just one area of vet med gives you any less perspective to the profession. I had easily 10,000 hours in small animal med when I was accepted. I knew about the other aspects of vet med and made an attempt to research them/know some current issues in those areas and made an attempt to get a few hours seeing them (though that didn't work out as well). I am not the brightest when it comes to horses/cows/sheep/etc, but I have learned fast.

The other thing that working in a clinic does that volunteering or shadowing does not provide you (generally, since most shadowing gigs don't allow for client interaction) is how to properly communicate with clients and how to build that relationship. Good communication is one of the best things that you can learn and if you can begin to get this down before vet school starts, it is a huge bonus. Going to a school where most of the students are young kids out of high school (with minimal or zero experience) and doing communication labs where a client from the teaching hospital volunteers to come in and acts out a scenario, you can see that these kids really are unsure of themselves and do not know where to start/what to ask/or how to begin a conversation with a client. It will be a learning process for them, they will get it down with experience and time, but having that experience before school, is really beneficial.
 
Last edited:
I also disagree with the poster saying that being a vet assistant is similar to being a physician's assistant.... that is a laughable comparison. A physician's assistant has gone through school and can even write some prescriptions.... a veterinary assistant does not come close in comparison. Just because they both end with assistant does not make them equal.

I don't think I said that. I did say, "in the human world physician assistants are above nurse and techs". My point was OTHER people are accustomed to thinking of assistants as being above techs because of PA's. Anyone in the veterinary field would not compare them, but that doesn't mean someone outside the industry won't. My purpose was really to say, maybe the OP doesn't yet know the difference between an assistant and a tech and given that many people outside of vet med confuse them, let's give this person the benefit of the doubt that they aren't actually planning to become a LVT.

I apologize for not being clear.
 
Last edited:
I don't think I said that. I did say, "in the human world physician assistants are above nurse and techs". My point was OTHER people are accustomed to thinking of assistants as being above techs because of PA's. Anyone in the veterinary field would not compare them, but that doesn't mean someone outside the industry won't. My purpose was really to say, maybe the OP doesn't yet know the difference between an assistant and a tech and given that many people outside of vet med confuse them, let's give this person the benefit of the doubt that they aren't actually planning to become a LVT.

I apologize for not being clear.

Yup, that's absolutely fair. I don't think I was jumping down the OP's throat, but I can only respond to the words she uses, not the words that I (apparently, if you are correct) may have guessed that she might have meant. Ya know?

But sure, if she meant she was going to work as a vet assistant or whatever, great, nothing wrong with that. You definitely don't have to do it, but if you're going to spend the time there, might as well make some money doing it.
 
Top