USC vs Cedars vs UCLA-SFV

Started by snowkhat
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

snowkhat

Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Any ideas on these three.

My favorite was Cedars. USC wasn't as warm and the program was giant. UCLA-SFV, I'm not a fan of the long distance driving in northwest LA and the program felt a little stagnant.

Let me know what you think.
 
Last edited:
USC - very large (mostly) county based program. I truly believe if you train at a place like this, you will come out prepared for anything. However, some of the drawbacks for me are: instability of admin/PDs (some residents were quite unhappy about this on my interview day); no inpatient unit (have to drive to off-site IP unit); lower pay than other area programs; (plus or minus depending on your interests), but definite move to churn out more research. If you are interested in forensics, prison psych, public/community psych, there are worse places you can go.

Cedars - smaller program; no LPS for now, so no training in involuntary admissions (which also greatly impacts the psychopathology you see on the unit and in OP f/u clinics); less diverse pt population; residents traditionally known for being unhappy/overworked, but I suspect that is changing with reduction of IP beds by half, no more invol admits. I got the impression you would get good experience w substance abuse, possibly reflective of the more affluent patient pool. If you are interested in private practice, you will obviously be better prepared for that training here.

UCLA/SFV - as you say, tons of driving; lots of VA (duh!); based on my interview day, this is the type of place where you can either hide away and coast by for 4 years, or have your hand held the entire way (but not really in between); seems like increased focus on psychotherapy training, perhaps as an adjunct to the very heavy biological basis of training sites (VA, Olive-View, etc.).


Obviously it's most important what you want what you thought of these places. What is it you are looking for in a program? Career plans? Impressions of these places? Feel free to PM me if you want.
 
Agree with Plickfu.

Having said that, UCLA-SFV and USC probably have easier access to really good BS research, if you're into that.

Cedars was pretty small, but I do think with recent changes, the workload will be far lighter, plus I'm told they're planning on adding PGY-2 spots, making things even easier. I absolutely think that for private practice, this one's the way to go.


If you want more of my thoughts, PM me.
 
Last edited: