This is legitimately one of the dumbest things I've ever seen on this sight and I've read the pre-med forums for years...
Seriously, this would be golden material for an interview. Asking them about the experience, what they gained, etc would tell a lot about how they would function in residency and part of a team. Especially if they get an LOR from an attending they interacted with, would tell me that candidate knew how to play the game and we don't have enough of those physicians in medicine.
Fear is often unfounded, see our entire country for reference...
Show me the evidence of this, otherwise we're just extrapolating on 'what ifs', which is pointless.
Again, where's the evidence?
This is a fair point. My take is that the difference is that med students may actually have the clinical knowledge to gain something from it whereas a pre-med is almost certainly going to be clueless to the actual clinical relevance of what they're seeing. Pre-meds are more likely to just do the scut and maybe listen to rounds about things they have no clue about. Med students, especially M2s, may actually get a chance to see how all the crap (or at least some of the relevant parts) they've been studying actually apply clinically. However, I do think this is exactly the kind of clinical volunteering med schools would be interested in seeing from pre-med applicants.
Don't confuse the bolded with indoctrination. PA programs often do a good job of this as they have classes and training alongside med students. The NP side is far more about indoctrination, though I admit they do a fantastic job of instilling impressive amounts of pride.
The most accurate thing you've said in this thread, the AMA needs to take some lessons from nursing there.