VA Mental Health Provider Venting / Problem-solving / Peer Support Thread

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Members don't see this ad.
I got exceeds expectations even though I was slightly low for RVUs, so even that doesn't necessarily matter that much depending on your supervisor and what else you're doing.
 
Our reviews factored into our annual bonus on the few years we received one. It wasn't a substantial difference from what I remember (e.g., maybe $500 vs. $1000). Probably more important for physicians, as I believe their bonuses are/were in the $10-20k range. And like you've said, I believe EDRP is contingent on at least being satisfactory.

As for BLS, as a few other folks have said, our facility pulled folks from patient care immediately upon expiration until it was completed.
 
WisNeuro said:
I thought they did away with that in 5? It was my understanding that the only specifiers now are the dissociative stuff and delayed onset.
Click to expand...
That's my understanding as well. I still see it added pretty frequently, though. And some folks seem to be taking full advantage of ICD-11's inclusion of Complex PTSD as a diagnosis.
 
Ah, they DID get rid of it! Thank you. But unfortunately the VA insists on using ICD. So I guess I still have to deal with it, but now I will not feel guilty about using unspecified.
 
Why do we keep using ICD? It's gonna be such a mess when ICD-11 hits and PTSD is drastically different.
 
cara susanna said:
Why do we keep using ICD? It's gonna be such a mess when ICD-11 hits and PTSD is drastically different.
Click to expand...
I believe it's a final rule through the US dept of health and human services dictating that all healthcare environments have have to use ICD-10 (I believe it's incorporated as part of HIPAA standards) ? Someone correct me if I'm wrong please
 
cara susanna said:
Why do we keep using ICD? It's gonna be such a mess when ICD-11 hits and PTSD is drastically different.
Click to expand...

ICD covers all medical dx (not just psychiatric) and is recognized by CMS and all the governing bodies as it is published by the World Health Organization as a standard with the U.S version getting input by CMS and AMA. DSM is managed by the American Psychiatric Association and is largely irrelevant except as a reference to practitioners like us.
 
Last edited:
NeuroJaguar said:
I believe it's a final rule through the US dept of health and human services dictating that all healthcare environments have have to use ICD-10 (I believe it's incorporated as part of HIPAA standards) ? Someone correct me if I'm wrong please
Click to expand...

You're correct. Except it's the ICD-10 CM.....

The USA uses a different version of the ICD than the rest of the world (i.e., the CM). The WHO owns the ICD, but they allow the AMA to publish a US specific version of the ICD. The publication of updates to the ICD-10 CM is a complicated thing, with lots of negotiations with the federal government.

It's also why the DSM is required to publish a cross walk between diagnostic codes.
 
Sanman said:
ICD covers all medical dx (not just psychiatric) and is recognized by CMS and all the governing bodies as it is published by the World Health Organization as a standard with the U.S version getting input by CMS and AMA. DSM is managed by the American Psychiatric Association and is largely irreverent except as a reference to practitioners like us.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't say it's largely irrelevant as a whole. Possibly as far as healthcare billing, sure. But DSM can be used in medicolegal/disability work.

I also think DSM's diagnostic criteria for PTSD are better overall than ICD's (and especially ICD-11's). ICD also has gems such as complex PTSD and postconcussional syndrome.
 
The VA is held to such high standards for timely consult management in-house but then with the community care dept it's like
🤷‍♀️
 
How this always goes:
1. I place community care consult, sched pt for 1 month f/u to ensure they don't get lost in the system
2. Month goes by without any action from cc
3. I see patient again, they opt to just see me for therapy in the future
 
AcronymAllergy said:
I wouldn't say it's largely irrelevant as a whole. Possibly as far as healthcare billing, sure. But DSM can be used in medicolegal/disability work.

I also think DSM's diagnostic criteria for PTSD are better overall than ICD's (and especially ICD-11's). ICD also has gems such as complex PTSD and postconcussional syndrome.
Click to expand...

I would argue that most medicolegal/disability work is based on arguments between professional and a professional reference is useful in that instance. I don't know many instances in which the DSM is picked up or used by non-mental health professionals (except the lawyers/judges doing the medicolegal work). So, I do feel that it is largely irrelevant to non-professionals.
 
cara susanna said:
How this always goes:
1. I place community care consult, sched pt for 1 month f/u to ensure they don't get lost in the system
2. Month goes by without any action from cc
3. I see patient again, they opt to just see me for therapy in the future
Click to expand...

I am actually getting folks are unhappy with community care after getting it and bouncing back to us. Then again they are seeing the veteran only every 4-5 weeks. So, the doctor shopping continues...
 
Sanman said:
I am actually getting folks are unhappy with community care after getting it and bouncing back to us. Then again they are seeing the veteran only every 4-5 weeks. So, the doctor shopping continues...
Click to expand...
Yep, that happened with us as well. Or I'd be booked out 6-8 months, would get them an appointment while also submitting the CC consult, and they'd still get in to see me before CC. I could count on one hand the number of CC neuropsych consults that actually went through successfully and before they got through my (admittedly long) waitlist.
 
I know this is a complaint as old as the VA but can no one in leadership actually do math and figure out that it is not realistic to assign 4 new patients a week to people expected to do 25-28 hours a week of direct care total.

I realized after my 4 intakes, 2 groups I have 19 hours of follow-up on a week with no holidays etc. If I'm doing really strict EBPs (which I try to) can get someone churned out in 12-16 week if I offer weekly appointments which I usually can't. But it is also the policy at my VA that anyone who has accessed outpatient in the last 24 months is entitled to come right back for a follow-up without any triage elsewhere. So I typically have 1-5 patients coming out of the woodwork via PCMHI or direct message a week. It would take me less than 2 months to be completely out of follow-up slots it seems like.

They're pushing this Sprint access thing so hard and discussing moving to dedicated intake providers but I still don't see how it works to provide adequate follow-ups unless people need really brief episodes like for CBTi.

Is Sprint working well anywhere and what are you all doing?
 
I don't think Sprint will work well anywhere in MH, lol. Our supervisor is trying to use it as a way to push harder for active episodes of care and EBP access.
 
Grenth said:
I know this is a complaint as old as the VA but can no one in leadership actually do math and figure out that it is not realistic to assign 4 new patients a week to people expected to do 25-28 hours a week of direct care total.

I realized after my 4 intakes, 2 groups I have 19 hours of follow-up on a week with no holidays etc. If I'm doing really strict EBPs (which I try to) can get someone churned out in 12-16 week if I offer weekly appointments which I usually can't. But it is also the policy at my VA that anyone who has accessed outpatient in the last 24 months is entitled to come right back for a follow-up without any triage elsewhere. So I typically have 1-5 patients coming out of the woodwork via PCMHI or direct message a week. It would take me less than 2 months to be completely out of follow-up slots it seems like.

They're pushing this Sprint access thing so hard and discussing moving to dedicated intake providers but I still don't see how it works to provide adequate follow-ups unless people need really brief episodes like for CBTi.

Is Sprint working well anywhere and what are you all doing?
Click to expand...

The only silly part about your statement is the suggestion that leadership actually looks at those numbers. The larger problem with mental health in general (as I have said before) is a lack of reimbursement and coding for decision making/management. As long as 45 min for CBTi or even supportive therapy is seen on a spreadsheet as the same as 45 min for a non-compliant, bipolar, complex PTSD, medically complex, etc. cases, the more people are incentivized to move to positions in lower acuity care areas. Sprint with only accelerate that trend.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, the episodes of care seems like a good idea in theory but it also seems incompatible with the political incentive to have care accessible to whoever wants it whenever they want it and for however long.

If we define access as intakes it might work great but I am starting to realize (slow learner here) that a system that allows free care and ties illness to benefits is not going to motivate people to benefit from discrete efficient episodes of treatment unless they give us a functional mechanism for discharging/denying care which seems unlikely to happen.

I do think this is probably more of an issue for those of us in general mental health since specialty clinics have more mechanisms for discharge/shuffling people around.
 
Grenth said:
Yeah, the episodes of care seems like a good idea in theory but it also seems incompatible with the political incentive to have care accessible to whoever wants it whenever they want it and for however long.

If we define access as intakes it might work great but I am starting to realize (slow learner here) that a system that allows free care and ties illness to benefits is not going to motivate people to benefit from discrete efficient episodes of treatment unless they give us a functional mechanism for discharging/denying care which seems unlikely to happen.

I do think this is probably more of an issue for those of us in general mental health since specialty clinics have more mechanisms for discharge/shuffling people around.
Click to expand...

Depends on how your local system is set up and how good you are at playing the system.
 
My local system is set up to be chaotic and motivate all but the worst providers to leave it seems. I am very lousy at playing the system but I'm wising up since I don't want to leave if there's any hope things can improve. I'm learning tricks here and would appreciate any more people have to share.
 
Grenth said:
Yeah, the episodes of care seems like a good idea in theory but it also seems incompatible with the political incentive to have care accessible to whoever wants it whenever they want it and for however long.

If we define access as intakes it might work great but I am starting to realize (slow learner here) that a system that allows free care and ties illness to benefits is not going to motivate people to benefit from discrete efficient episodes of treatment unless they give us a functional mechanism for discharging/denying care which seems unlikely to happen.

I do think this is probably more of an issue for those of us in general mental health since specialty clinics have more mechanisms for discharge/shuffling people around.
Click to expand...

Yes, I think there are major systemic barriers. The active episodes of care model though just stipulates that you have periods where you check in on progress and determine if additional care is needed. It's not saying "at this date we're ending treatment and that's that." Granted, even with that we all know we have patients we are going to see for their rest of their/our lives.

I'm 50% general OPMH (and even my 50% PCT role is limited in terms of who I can discharge) so I feel your pain.
 
Grenth said:
They're pushing this Sprint access thing so hard and discussing moving to dedicated intake providers but I still don't see how it works to provide adequate follow-ups unless people need really brief episodes like for CBTi.

Is Sprint working well anywhere and what are you all doing?
Click to expand...
It doesn't and will not.

From my experience, whenever a new political priority arises, we will do whatever we can to satisfy that priority, even if it literally undoes everything the the last/previous political priority was trying to achieve.

From a purely political perspective, it's likely that the last set of admin/leaders who issued the previous guidance are no longer in govt service (or VA service or in another VA role with other demands) so their institutional knowledge & desires get wiped away and we focus on the new priorities.

Some individual sites are better at pushing back or using half measures to look like they are meeting these new goals (and usually have plans to tweak metrics in small but meaningful ways that help them stay under the radar) but most sites don't have that type of leadership stability. Or have leadership stability but everybody is just looking to get promoted and will do the politically expedient thing.

So we basically end up as the definition of throwing the baby out with the bath water. Rinse & repeat endlessly.

I try to do what I can to be subversive in small ways that promote good patient care (but generally stays under the radar) since that's about all I can control.
 
Yup, this is a congress thing and unfortunately the VA has to obey the whims of the government even if they are completely unreasonable or clinically not indicated.
 
Us outpatient mental health therapists were just informed about this push for sprint recently in my clinic. It sounds punishing toward providers who need to take time off at worst, and an administrative mess when trying to figure out intake clinics when already short staffed at best. I wish our leadership would slow play this until national stopped caring. It really annoys me that the big wigs only seem to care about when someone is initially seen and don't care about whether vets have good access to ebps or even improve in tx
 
psy.d. 2021 said:
Us outpatient mental health therapists were just informed about this push for sprint recently in my clinic. It sounds punishing toward providers who need to take time off at worst, and an administrative mess when trying to figure out intake clinics when already short staffed at best. I wish our leadership would slow play this until national stopped caring. It really annoys me that the big wigs only seem to care about when someone is initially seen and don't care about whether vets have good access to ebps or even improve in tx
Click to expand...

Upper leadership also has NO idea how mental health works and always treats it the same as primary care.
 
I worked at a place where upper leadership thought that depending on the disorder, you just pull the corresponding tx manual off your bookshelf and read it together with the patient in session and do worksheets together for few visits, then they are cured. And you put the manual back on the shelf, and on to the next.

.... tell me you've never seen a patient, without telling me you've never seen a patient. MBAs, man.
 
Reading this thread to remind myself why I shouldn't go over to our local VA, despite them getting a nearly 15k raise recently...
 
VA can definitely be a good gig, especially with the pay bumps and if you're the type of person who's not easily aggravated by administrative hassles, can let bureaucratic frustrations roll off your back, and land at a good VA with supportive mid- and upper-level management. I think mid-career folks are the ones who have the hardest time there. There's big appeal for returning for 5 years before retiring to be able to take your health insurance with you.
 
Most of my patients have decided it's too cold for therapy. I have seen two people today and one person for half a session yesterday.
 
Shiori said:
Most of my patients have decided it's too cold for therapy. I have seen two people today and one person for half a session yesterday.
Click to expand...

Is this telehealth or in-person? In-person will take a huge hit on these days but telehealth would surprise me. Just grab some hot cocoa and come get therapized. 🤣
 
Shiori said:
Most of my patients have decided it's too cold for therapy. I have seen two people today and one person for half a session yesterday.
Click to expand...
My local hard freeze warnings didn't include but also didn't exclude emotions, ya know?
cara susanna said:
Not me racing to cancel the BHL Touch administration for my patient who late cancelled, otherwise they'll report their chronic SI on the PHQ-9 and I'll have to try to reach them via phone
Click to expand...
I'm very pro measurement based care in principle but too often anti measurement based care in practice for reasons exactly like this.
 
AcronymAllergy said:
VA can definitely be a good gig, especially with the pay bumps and if you're the type of person who's not easily aggravated by administrative hassles, can let bureaucratic frustrations roll off your back, and land at a good VA with supportive mid- and upper-level management. I think mid-career folks are the ones who have the hardest time there. There's big appeal for returning for 5 years before retiring to be able to take your health insurance with you.
Click to expand...

Though there are many complaints, I think VA falls pretty high on the salaried employee scale as far as desirability. Certainly better than those large, take 50% of your money group practices. Now a good group or solo PP is a different animal altogether. However, I personally think that is more of an option when you don't need the job/money and can afford to take risks.
 
summerbabe said:
My local hard freeze warnings didn't include but also didn't exclude emotions, ya know?

I'm very pro measurement based care in principle but too often anti measurement based care in practice for reasons exactly like this.
Click to expand...

Measurement can be good, but not when it's just measurement for measurement's sake, or to check a box for someone in regional office, such is the case in the VA. I'm a big proponent that we should be doing a lot more to track healthcare outcomes to help with policy and regulation, but as measurement is generally done currently, that is not really possible in a meaningful way.
 
Shiori said:
Most of my patients have decided it's too cold for therapy. I have seen two people today and one person for half a session yesterday.
Click to expand...

I had 1 out of 4 patients show today, and I'm all telehealth at the moment.
 
Yeah, I have an almost even split of telehealth and face to face. I haven't noticed much difference in their no-show and cancellation rates.
 
Don't forget about the VA's exhaustive system of metrics. I can look at just about any breakdown little my heart desires.
 
WisNeuro said:
Given that the no-show rates for VA patients is already an outlier, it'd be hard to notice differences in no-show rates to begin with.
Click to expand...

Even with VA no show rates, you would think the attendance rate would be better when the bar is set as pickup your phone and click a button. You don't even need to get out of bed to do that. Let alone put on clothes.
 
Sanman said:
Even with VA no show rates, you would think the attendance rate would be better when the bar is set as pickup your phone and click a button. You don't even need to get out of bed to do that. Let alone put on clothes.
Click to expand...

I honestly don't think it's ease of attendance for the most part. I really do think it boils down to zero accountability on the patient's part. They can generally no-show as much as they want with minimal backlash. The total number of no shows in my clinical practice over the past 3 years in my private practice is less than what I would generally get in a few weeks at the VA. And, of those no-shows, one was hospitalized the night before, and one literally died, so in essence I've only had one actual no show in 3 years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

N
  • Poll Poll
Health Psychology: support and vent thread
Replies
39
Views
4K
oliversacks4thewin
oliversacks4thewin
N
Health Psychology Support Thread/Discord
Replies
5
Views
2K
nicolascagephd
N
Sanman
ProPublica Article on Mental Health
Replies
16
Views
3K
Therapist4Chnge
T
quickpsych
Education Department stops $1 billion in funding for school mental health
Replies
6
Views
2K
Shiori
Shiori
pinkbromeliad
Help from Non-VA Health System Providers: salary and negotiation
Replies
25
Views
3K
R. Matey
R. Matey
Top