- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
- Messages
- 205
- Reaction score
- 193
For those of us who have been spoiled and been using pre-filled Eylea syringes, what syringe are you using for Vabysmo? Are you using a silicone free one? Those options seem to be limited.
Just a filter. It's BYO syringe and 30G needledoesn't it come with syringe, filter and needle?
J code should be coming Oct 1st, from what the Genentech rep told me last weekend. We’ll see.I suppose we are likely to use a standard 1ml tuberculin syringe from BD. We haven't used much vabysmo due to reimbursement issues. Have you experienced any issues? Do they have a J code yet? I'm interested in using but I think we still haven't gotten paid for one of the earlier injections so we are a bit hesitant to do more.
I agree, Susvimo is Genentech's last attempt to squeeze out whatever they can out of Lucentis, but financially it reimburses poorly for both the surgery and the refill. More worrisome, I'm hearing reports of endophthalmitis from surgeons who were initially pretty high on it during clinical trials. PDS is great as a concept but I don't think it'll catch on due to the risks - there's a reason why glaucoma surgeons have been trying to move away from trabs and tubes. They should really be pushing Vabysmo hard.Ok thx. I feel like genetech is in a bit of a pickle. Launched susvimo and vabysmo concurrently sort of competing with itself, major reimbursement issues for both, regeneron will soon have high dose Eylea, and on top of that biosimilars are on the near horizon
I’ve tried to sign a few pts up for the PDS because I figured there’d be strong interest in only needing a refill every six months. Most pts are excited until I tell them about the reported 4% endo rate with the PDS.I agree, Susvimo is Genentech's last attempt to squeeze out whatever they can out of Lucentis, but financially it reimburses poorly for both the surgery and the refill. More worrisome, I'm hearing reports of endophthalmitis from surgeons who were initially pretty high on it during clinical trials. PDS is great as a concept but I don't think it'll catch on due to the risks - there's a reason why glaucoma surgeons have been trying to move away from trabs and tubes. They should really be pushing Vabysmo hard.
For the biosimilars, it'll come down to cost, but the Lucentis biosimilar currently isn't that much of a cost reduction.
The septum in the PDS also apparently has a high rate of dislodging in actual real world use.
I avoid most drugs and devices the first year they come out. The adverse event rates detected and reported by company funded trials don’t always seem to reflect what’s seen after the trial.
Heard about this. This is a major problem. Device needs to be redesigned sounds like. I was told this is an issue with re-filing, and more likely a problem after multiple refills. At any rate, great proof of concept, but not ready for prime time is my take. Now that Vabysmo has permanent J code, will likely start moving more non-responders that direction.Just heard from one of my colleagues that due to the septum dislodgement rate being much higher than expected from clinical trials, it will likely undergo voluntary recall. Oops.
Yeah I don't see Susvimo really working out long term, especially if Vabysmo really gets us to Q4 month extension or more. Maybe if Genentech filled the reservoir with Vabysmo and was able to show no treatment for a year...
clear throat...Beovu...cough...coughThe septum in the PDS also apparently has a high rate of dislodging in actual real world use.
I avoid most drugs and devices the first year they come out. The adverse event rates detected and reported by company funded trials don’t always seem to reflect what’s seen after the trial.
Beovu is the most blatant example. But we can keep goingclear throat...Beovu...cough...cough