Vapor pressure, BP elevation, FP depression

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

kasho11

Full Member
Joined
May 29, 2011
Messages
442
Reaction score
1

Members don't see this ad.
So I had a question regarding the colligative property formulas. Kaplan uses these equations without the Van't Hoff Factor, whereas TPR shows these equations with the Van't Hoff Factor included, for example osmotic pressure for Kaplan is MRT, whereas for TPR it's MiRT. I feel safer going with TPR's formula but why the disparity?

On a related note I had been struggling with the concept of vapor pressure for a while but I ended up realizing it's basically the same thing as FP depression and BP elevation. All 3 act to keep solutes in the liquid phase. The addition of more solute acts as little chemical anchors tying them down to the liquid phase and preventing them from escaping.
 

MrNeuro

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
606
Reaction score
5
So I had a question regarding the colligative property formulas. Kaplan uses these equations without the Van't Hoff Factor, whereas TPR shows these equations with the Van't Hoff Factor included, for example osmotic pressure for Kaplan is MRT, whereas for TPR it's MiRT. I feel safer going with TPR's formula but why the disparity?

On a related note I had been struggling with the concept of vapor pressure for a while but I ended up realizing it's basically the same thing as FP depression and BP elevation. All 3 act to keep solutes in the liquid phase. The addition of more solute acts as little chemical anchors tying them down to the liquid phase and preventing them from escaping.

use TPRs
 

MedPR

Membership Revoked
Removed
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
18,579
Reaction score
55
Finding osmotic pressure as Π = MRT is just assuming a non-dissociating solute and thus a Van't Hoff factor of i = 1. The equation is always Π = iMRT (or MiRT or however you want to arrange it.)


:thumbup: It's just a shorter way of writing the formula. A similar example is "F=ma" which is technically incorrect notation. The correct way to write it is "ΣF=ma" but it's such a common equation that we very rarely bother writing in the sigma.
 
Top