Mitchconnie speaks the truth.
Let's understand what we're doing with skull trephination... and why (I'm just an ER doc, not a neurosurgeon, so don't take this as medical advice, or the establishment of a physician-patient relationship, blah, blah, blah, etc).
You usually pursue a burr-hole when you're faced with a rapidly-deteriorating patient, a specific pattern of injury, a specific set of physical findings, and
mandatory consultation with a neurosurgeon (remember, there is no imaging in the field). Typically some mixture of:
- blown pupil (implying uncal herniation and third-nerve compression)
- cushing's reflex (implying increased ICP and cerebral ischemia)
- rapidly decreasing GCS
The burr-hole is usually drilled on the same side as the anisocoria... but the bleed can be on the contralateral side in 5% of cases (so you may end up drilling two holes). Fronto-temporal epidural bleeds are the fastest bleeders, and the compressed time interval makes them potentially benefit from this procedure more than any other ICH (subdurals tend to accumulate much more slowly). Once penetrating the inner table of the skull with the drill, you can tap into the hematoma directly (remember, it's an epidural bleed). Epidural bleeds in that location are almost always (80%+) caused by a temporal fracture and subsequent meningeal artery tear.
You can also partially decompress a subdural with a burr-hole, as some of the blood can be removed once you incise the dura. This procedure will do absolutely nothing for any sort of diffuse intra-cerebral edema, intraparenchymal bleed, intra-ventricular blood, or classic coup/contra-coup petechial hemorrhage.
I concur that few patients would benefit from this procedure in the field, and you'd be hard-pressed to justify delaying their emergent transfer to do one. Consider that blast injury (probably the lion's share of our casualties) is unlikely to cause a focal epidural bleed in that location, and that the overpressure is much more likely to cause a DAI-type of injury pattern.
This study from WRAMC would seem to validate that suspicion. 433 patients seen at WRAMC with traumatic brain injury over a 27-month period, and only 1.5% had epidural bleeds (18% had subdurals, which are often observed rather than rushing to do a crani). By my math, that's only a half-dozen epidurals over a two-year period. Now ask if any of that half-dozen might have been sufficiently decompensating at such a rapid rate in a remote location that a 45-minute helo-ride would be too long, necessitating an emergent skull trephination.
I'd bet the number of times this would be needed is extraordinarily small.