- Joined
- Jul 16, 2012
- Messages
- 92
- Reaction score
- 38
Hey guys,
after taking alot of verbal reasoning practice tests from different books (BR, Kaplan, and EK), i've been noticing that the styles of questions are all very different for each company.
For BR i noticed heavy focus on application, main idea, and inference questions
whereas for EK its strictly (mostly all) retrieval questions.
I was wondering which one the MCAT is more similar to? I've been practicing EK more because of its popularity but as I take them, I'm beginning to fear that the skills im developing for strictly retrieval will not be what I really need for the MCAT?
(BTW im wondering this because I found that it's relatively easy for me to improve on EK verbal because I learned to adapt to their retrieval questions types [went from an 8 to 9 to 10 to 12 on the first four tests] whereas for Berkeley Review, I have extreme difficulty with it and don't show much improvement from consecutive tests)
after taking alot of verbal reasoning practice tests from different books (BR, Kaplan, and EK), i've been noticing that the styles of questions are all very different for each company.
For BR i noticed heavy focus on application, main idea, and inference questions
whereas for EK its strictly (mostly all) retrieval questions.
I was wondering which one the MCAT is more similar to? I've been practicing EK more because of its popularity but as I take them, I'm beginning to fear that the skills im developing for strictly retrieval will not be what I really need for the MCAT?
(BTW im wondering this because I found that it's relatively easy for me to improve on EK verbal because I learned to adapt to their retrieval questions types [went from an 8 to 9 to 10 to 12 on the first four tests] whereas for Berkeley Review, I have extreme difficulty with it and don't show much improvement from consecutive tests)
Last edited: