- Joined
- Jul 19, 2009
- Messages
- 7,334
- Reaction score
- 40
- Points
- 4,691
"A viral plaque is a visible structure formed within a cell culture...The bacteriophage viruses replicate and spread, thus generating regions of cell destructions known as plaques.
These plaques can sometimes be detected visually using colony counters, in much the same way as bacterial colonies are counted; however, they are not always visible to the naked eye, and..."
So this means that if you're given a chart of dilutions and # of plaques formed on the plate you can calculate #phage/mL in much the same way you would calculate cells/mL of a liquid culture of bacteria if you were given the dilution and the number of colonies formed on the plate, because you assume one phage made the plaque you're looking at. Am I right?
Also, how does viral plaque assaying work? (ex. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:M._smegmatis_plaque.jpg) I understand the basics of it, but more specificaly I'm wondering why there's a lawn of bacteria and not just colonies formed in this technique, as I probably would have expected.
The other thing I was wondering was why one plaque doesn't lyse the entire plate (why plaques don't increase in size indefinitely)? (this is the most important question I don't understand)
I'm sorry if this isn't exactly DAT related, but these things came up in my genetics class, and when I asked my professor she didn't provide an adequate explanation (and it's not really covered in the notes or the book...it's on a problem set she handed out in class >.<).
Thanks so much!
These plaques can sometimes be detected visually using colony counters, in much the same way as bacterial colonies are counted; however, they are not always visible to the naked eye, and..."
So this means that if you're given a chart of dilutions and # of plaques formed on the plate you can calculate #phage/mL in much the same way you would calculate cells/mL of a liquid culture of bacteria if you were given the dilution and the number of colonies formed on the plate, because you assume one phage made the plaque you're looking at. Am I right?
Also, how does viral plaque assaying work? (ex. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:M._smegmatis_plaque.jpg) I understand the basics of it, but more specificaly I'm wondering why there's a lawn of bacteria and not just colonies formed in this technique, as I probably would have expected.
The other thing I was wondering was why one plaque doesn't lyse the entire plate (why plaques don't increase in size indefinitely)? (this is the most important question I don't understand)
I'm sorry if this isn't exactly DAT related, but these things came up in my genetics class, and when I asked my professor she didn't provide an adequate explanation (and it's not really covered in the notes or the book...it's on a problem set she handed out in class >.<).
Thanks so much!