If anyone has any information about the philosophy/orientation (in terms of biological/neuro vs. psychodynamic) of any of the west coast programs, I would love to hear about it.
My understanding and correct me if I am wrong but from my sources-
UCSD-biologically skewed
UCLA-biolocically skewed
UCI-pretty even
UCD-lots of therapy-pretty much even
Stanford and UCSF-pretty strong and even in both-maybe stanford a little more biological.
My understanding and correct me if I am wrong but from my sources-
UCSD-biologically skewed
UCLA-biolocically skewed
UCI-pretty even
UCD-lots of therapy-pretty much even
Stanford and UCSF-pretty strong and even in both-maybe stanford a little more biological.
i have yet to interview at ucsd but otherwise this is what i have found reg CA but i feel like all of them would give you very good psychotherapy training no doubt.
as far as UW, i believe it is very well rounded and does an excellent job with the psychotherapy. they also have an emphasis on DBT b/c the woman who founded it is there. so i would say they are more even...
This site uses cookies to help personalize content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies and terms of service.