During the healthcare debates, I believe that the Economist magazine stated that improving healthcare would *NOT* cut costs about healthcare. This is very counter-intuitive to me. One nice person here even found the flaw in the research paper that I hyperlinked written by Harvard.
1. What do you think are the economic and health benefits of improved IT?
2. What model should we strive for (i.e. Finnish IT healthcare systems)?
3. What are the biggest hindrances to this (i.e. insurance companies do *NOT* want us to have good IT infrastructure)?
1. What do you think are the economic and health benefits of improved IT?
2. What model should we strive for (i.e. Finnish IT healthcare systems)?
3. What are the biggest hindrances to this (i.e. insurance companies do *NOT* want us to have good IT infrastructure)?
