- Joined
- Aug 17, 2007
- Messages
- 425
- Reaction score
- 35
wow. Let me just say that I am thoroughly impressed with all of the posted areas on interests thus far. These are some very challenging populations. You're all a bunch of rock stars!
Psychometrics is another huge interest of mine. LOVE my stats classes thus far.
I'm kind of all over the place. Always been interested in forensics (esp. sex offenders and violent crime) but my undergrad thesis was about attachment style similarity in romantic relationships. Now I'm in grad school and I'm in a forensic lab, but with a combination of hating the attitude of the forensic people I've met so far and my assessment prof telling me I'm better suited to other types of clinical work, I'm getting away from the "hard" forensic stuff. Now I'm interested in the "police personality," and coping skills for critical incident stress.
It'll probably change again. I haven't told my supervisor that I'm not doing a thesis on sex offenders yet because he scares me and will probably not be pleased.
AH! Your interests are like mine! So what happened, the forensic people don't have good attitudes at your place? I've always...I mean, I feel more toward clinical, but the interest areas of mine (sex offenders, violent crime. etc) typically fall under forensic, right? But the legality of things, court cases, etc does NOT interest me. I want to help, therapy, that stuff. So I'm not sure what to aim for.
You typically need a clinical degree to do forensics, although not in all cases.
My supervisor's a jerk so he's inspired everyone in the lab to be the same way and it's a pretty negative environment.
I know it sounds really interesting to do therapy with sex offenders and it was a rude awakening to me when I had to give up on that idea. It's (in my opinion) one of the most political fields of psychology and I think that would be exhausting.
Hmm. Yeah. The area seems more taboo than a lot so I guess a lot of crap could go with it. But, I guess, what do you mean by political? If this is getting too off-topic from my topic 😉 I can ask you in a PM.
It's not that it's taboo, it's that work with sex offenders requires work with government agencies. It translate into politics in grad school 'cause supervisors work with the government and then they hate other groups and yadda yadda yadda. Most of our lab group meetings involve our supervisor bashing how other provinces do things.
Hmm. It's unfortunate that that sort of crap pushed you away from what you were initially interested in. Though I'm sure you don't need me reminding you.
Oh that's okay, interests have to evolve one way or another. I'm sure most people don't spend 60 years doing the same kind of research/work.
There's a prof I know who spent the first half of her career doing very scientific quantitative research, then one day she felt like she was missing something so she started doing qualitative and now that's all she does.
Lol so you've given up on the sex offenders? I'd be curious what schools you looked at for that sort of thing (and/or violent crime)as that was your initial interest... just because, I'm not sure what's out there as far as that goes. Again, I could PM to ask but also don't want to bother you too much 😛
Hahaha, so basically changing the world. But hey, we've all gotta believe we can do that or we wouldn't be doing this, right?
Indeed. Or at least the whole starfish thing. That's what I'm aiming for. I have a feeling changing the world is impossible. But if you can help at least one...that's more than if you hadn't even done that. And sometimes helping just one can have a bigger effect, so on.
And, with something like what you want - if you can actually implement a more fundamental change...hey the process of change may be slow but every step towards it counts.
I'm focusing on veterans with comorbid PTSD and substance abuse. I want to deal with war veterans who come home, aren't identified as having PTSD (even though they do), and go home and end up in a cycle of substance abuse as a result. I'm interested in the VA system and how it evaluates PTSD in war veterans. The ultimate goal would be to change things so that PTSD is better recognized, and if it's not, to destigmatize mental health help to the point where veterans would actually regularly seek it out. Hahaha, so basically changing the world. But hey, we've all gotta believe we can do that or we wouldn't be doing this, right? Also I'm really interested in assessment. My orientation swings CBT, but not exclusively. I'm just starting to have an interest in family systems, and work that into the veteran's family unit that they return home to... and how their PTSD and substance use affects the family and the veteran.
Very cool thread 👍
Research areas previously posted here.
Broadly, health psychology.
Specifically, I'm pretty scattered. My primary interest is in the basic cognitive processes that underlie substance use and abuse, specifically tobacco. I tie this in to my secondary interest, which is depression research because I think many of these cognitive processes are what helps explain the high comorbidity between these two (and many other, for that matter) psychological disorders - though I don't exactly have empirical support for that yet, talk to me after my master's😉.
... is it just me or does ^ not add up to 100%?....
maybe my eyes are going bad from staring at the interview invite thread too much 🙄
I work in a cultural psychology lab that studies the differences between Westerners and East Asians in things like cognition and social interaction.
I also do some work in a developmental lab that runs twin behavior genetics studies, but cultural psych is my passion. I just do the development stuff because it's fun.
Interesting, you say that after I just spent 8 hours doing reading for my Culture and Mental Illness class that I loathe. But it's a prof thing not a subject thing, I think it's fascinating.
Wow, my research sure changed since I started this thread, haha.
My dissertation is a two-parter. The first is qualitative research with experts about victim-offender mediation to see what "effectiveness" is. The second part is a quantitative study investigating the possible contributing factors to victim-offender mediation effectiveness. One of the specific questions I'm asking is whether or not attachment style of the victims and offenders makes a difference in perceptions of effectiveness after they participate in mediation.
Phew, sorry that was long-winded. I'm writing my proposal, can you tell?
I work on conceptual / theoretical issues. I've done research on dissociative identity disorder, delusion, emotion, and currently i'm tackling some issues to do with psychiatric nosology / classification.
It's interesting to go back and read my original responses to this thread. After getting a lot more clinical experience under my belt, I don't consider myself psychodynamic at all, but instead have a behavioral orientation.
Wow, my research sure changed since I started this thread, haha.