- Joined
- Mar 17, 2012
- Messages
- 54
- Reaction score
- 0
You clearly haven't taken beyond a 100 level psych class if you think psychology is mainly subjective. And what theories are you talking about? Before you give me some bs quote from freudian psychologists you have to realize that most sciences evolve from speculation/philosophical questions, just like psychology had some unscientific beginnings, so did other "more" scientific fields like biology (people once thought we had things called "humors" controling our behavior), chemistry (alchemy) astronomy (geocentric universe) etc... so yes you could argue that psychology isn't a science based on a few famous (read: popular) theories from the late 1800's and early 1900's but that's not what modern psychology is about.
So what are some factual psychological theories (that don't involve neuroscience or chemistry)?
For example, the Rorschach inkblot tests. I see something in a picture, and based off what I see a psychologist can tell me something about my personality. But his interpretation of what I see is subjective. What if I was in a bad mood that day and saw something I don't normally see? And you can find holes like these in a LOT of psychology concepts.
I'm not saying that its not a science - I'm saying that no other "science" borders on pseudoscience as much as psychology.