Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I just posted this as a response to another thread, but now I think this deserves its own.
If your compensation was productivity driven and you had the opportunity to devise your own formula/bonus structure, what would it look like and why structure it this way?
Examples:
Low base . . . with lower threshold for bonus to kick in, say at $600K of collections?
Higher base salary for cushion and then very profitable at a higher set point . . .eg. 70% of collections after 1 million.
No base at all and just keep a percentage of total collections . . . keep 40% of everything collected.
How would you structure your "perfect" productivity formula?
If your compensation was productivity driven and you had the opportunity to devise your own formula/bonus structure, what would it look like and why structure it this way?
Examples:
Low base . . . with lower threshold for bonus to kick in, say at $600K of collections?
Higher base salary for cushion and then very profitable at a higher set point . . .eg. 70% of collections after 1 million.
No base at all and just keep a percentage of total collections . . . keep 40% of everything collected.
How would you structure your "perfect" productivity formula?