- Joined
- Jun 30, 2010
- Messages
- 57
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Pre-Optometry
An OD is educated to be the best clinician for the eyecare.
Therefore it is important for him/her to receive a strong clinical education.
Even the board exam is changing to be more clinically oriented.
That is why I chose PCO which is known for a strong clinical education than other optometry schools.
Im not saying other schools have worse clinical education, I am just saying that PCO is very reputational in clinical education.
Waterloo is rather a didactically strong school because the patient population around the school are generally quite healthy, and even if there are unhealthy patients, they are taken away by the waterloo grad optometrists near the University of Waterloo. That's why many waterloo grads tend to go for a residency abroad to enhance their clinical skills.
1)My question is, is there a difference between the quality of ODs who graduated from clinically educated insitution and those who graduated from didactically educated institution?
2)What sort of disadvantage would there be as a practicing otpometrist if you graduate from a didactically strong school that lacks top clinical education?
What sort of disadvantage would there be as a practicing optomerist if you gradaute from a clinically strong school that lacks top didactic education?
3)How do didactically strong school ensure that graduating students are just as proficient as other school students?
Therefore it is important for him/her to receive a strong clinical education.
Even the board exam is changing to be more clinically oriented.
That is why I chose PCO which is known for a strong clinical education than other optometry schools.
Im not saying other schools have worse clinical education, I am just saying that PCO is very reputational in clinical education.
Waterloo is rather a didactically strong school because the patient population around the school are generally quite healthy, and even if there are unhealthy patients, they are taken away by the waterloo grad optometrists near the University of Waterloo. That's why many waterloo grads tend to go for a residency abroad to enhance their clinical skills.
1)My question is, is there a difference between the quality of ODs who graduated from clinically educated insitution and those who graduated from didactically educated institution?
2)What sort of disadvantage would there be as a practicing otpometrist if you graduate from a didactically strong school that lacks top clinical education?
What sort of disadvantage would there be as a practicing optomerist if you gradaute from a clinically strong school that lacks top didactic education?
3)How do didactically strong school ensure that graduating students are just as proficient as other school students?