- Joined
- Apr 1, 2020
- Messages
- 72
- Reaction score
- 19
I have received two delayed decisions 3 weeks to a month after interviews. Is this a sort of informal waitlist? Maybe I'm being neurotic, but any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Deferral has a specific meaning in AMCAS admissions: an acceptance that results in a delayed matriculation.It sounds more like a deferral
To me, it always means that they like you enough to not reject you post interview, but the adcom hasn't decided whether to go ahead with an acceptance or to put you on the waitlist, so they delay their decision and review more post interview candidates and then circle back to you, and see if they can give an official decision at that time.I have received two delayed decisions 3 weeks to a month after interviews. Is this a sort of informal waitlist? Maybe I'm being neurotic, but any advice would be greatly appreciated.
It's a little more subtle than this, because some schools, like NYU, actually follow a delayed decision with a R, not a WL or an A.To me, it always means that they like you enough to not reject you post interview, but the adcom hasn't decided whether to go ahead with an acceptance or to put you on the waitlist, so they delay their decision and review more post interview candidates and then circle back to you, and see if they can give an official decision at that time.
Haha... so one of them is actually NYU 🙁It's a little more subtle than this, because some schools, like NYU, actually follow a delayed decision with a R, not a WL or an A.
But, you're right. It's exactly what it sounds like, a delayed decision. Sometimes they even turn into As, without a pit stop on the WL. They are what they are. There is nothing to read into. It just means they are not ready to make a decision on you.
A lot of schools have a decision called "deferred" though. Basically means the same thing as a delayed decision, except restricted to WL or A, no R.Deferral has a specific meaning in AMCAS admissions: an acceptance that results in a delayed matriculation.
Best of luck with that. They are unique for all the reasons you certainly know. As a result, the vast majority of their earlier interviewees are in exactly your boat. No reason to be neurotic, and no, it's not an informal WL. WL with them is actually not a terrible place to be. The majority of their interviewees will be rejected when they start dumping decisions in January.Haha... so one of them is actually NYU 🙁
I'm pretty sure @gyngyn knows what they are talking about here! 🙂 As stated, deferral usually means deferred matriculation, not decision. Which schools actually call a delayed decision a deferral, and how many are "a lot"?A lot of schools have a decision called "deferred" though. Basically means the same thing as a delayed decision, except restricted to WL or A, no R.
Two schools I applied to have given out post interview "acceptance", "rejection", and "deferred". The deferred email said it turns into a waitlist at the end of the cycle.No, usually in terms of admissions, deferred application means they have yet to consider you at all, ie, grant you an interview.
Delayed decision means they have interviewed and have not made any final decision on acceptance
Alternate /WL means you have been accepted by adcom and are waiting for a seat.
Delayed decision here usually means that your overall scoring/classification/priority of both written application and interview is below the cut off first acceptances. They will wait to interview and review more applicants before returning to decide on yours.
Haha fair enoughIn my mind, there are only 3 states to an application: accepted, rejected or undetermined. If you're not informed of being an A or R, then you're in an undetermined/unknown state in which case all the various terminology and nuances don't really matter. I realize we want to know how close we are to an A or R but it's impossible to know so I'd suggest trying to focus on something else.
True, but undetermined could be because you haven't yet been looked at, or have been looked at and put aside for a later determination. I would argue there is a value to knowing which bucket you fall into.In my mind, there are only 3 states to an application: accepted, rejected or undetermined. If you're not informed of being an A or R, then you're in an undetermined/unknown state in which case all the various terminology and nuances don't really matter. I realize we want to know how close we are to an A or R but it's impossible to know so I'd suggest trying to focus on something else.