What does it mean to Clone a Gene

Started by Haybrant
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Haybrant

1K Member
20+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Hello Scientists,

Can someone tell me what it means to clone a gene? I know it used to be a big thing back in the day but the technology is such that it is now easy; why is it easier now, and what does cloning a gene tell you? How would you know where to start? Overview of the procedure? Thanks!
 
Haybrant said:
Hello Scientists,

Can someone tell me what it means to clone a gene? I know it used to be a big thing back in the day but the technology is such that it is now easy; why is it easier now, and what does cloning a gene tell you? How would you know where to start? Overview of the procedure? Thanks!

How about: to incorporate a segment of DNA corresponding to a gene in a vector that can then replicate in another organism.

This can be a genomic clone (introns and gene regulatory elements included)...or it can be a cDNA clone (coding sequence only).

It's easier now because of the completion of various genome sequencing projects--and gene annotation (preliminary identification of what a gene encodes), which is becoming more and more complete everyday.


People can start by one of many routes. But two of the most common are by:

(1) a genetic screen - Mutagenizing many individuals and then searching for the one mutant that has a biochemical, developmental, or behavioral phenotype of interest. This phenotype is then followed over a series of genetic crosses with marker strains (phenotypic or genotypic "signposts" at different chromosomal sites) that allow determination of a gene's coordinates.

(2) screening by homology - Taking a known gene and looking for relatives (which should have similar sequence motifs) by using, for instance, bacterial clones with diced-up DNA fragments from the organism of interest. By Watson-Crick basepairing between a labeled probe and your bacterial clones (under conditions which are permissive of less than perfect basepair matching), you could pull-up gene cousins, this way.


In Case #1, isolating the clone--and finding that overexpression (or, conversely, knocking-out) a gene either rescues or reproduces a phenotype helps prove your argument that gene X is responsible for the mutant phenotype you isolated. This can then be used to help you construct gene pathways and gain traction into a process whose molecular underpinnings are not yet fully understood.

In Case #2, isolating related genes can help you determine what function(s) similar gene products (to the one you started with) mediate. Sometimes, you can gain a fuller understanding of your starting gene, this way, by seeing what a cousin does in a different context. For instance, if the starting gene is neuronally-expressed--and behavior is too difficult a thing for you to study--perhaps by understanding what a related gene does in development will give you biological metaphors with which to understand your starting gene.
 
It's definitely easier to clone a gene now than in the days before PCR and the genome projects, but it's still a bitch if you're working with a species that hasn't been lucky enough to have its genome sequenced. I'm working with Aplysia californica, and all we have to go by is a crappy, poorly annotated EST database, so cloning a gene for us takes a lot of time and effort.