- Joined
- Sep 3, 2004
- Messages
- 134
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm a Ph.D. I don't really know what a DO is. I know what an MD is. How does a DO differ from an MD? If an MD and DO end up at the same hospital, practicing side by side do they do anything different? If different treatment...then how? Why should I chose a DO over an MD or visa versa? And if there basically is no real difference when a DO and an MD practice side by side in the hospital then why have an OM in the first place?.....is there a purpose? I'm assuming, perhaps wrongly, that med school was around first. So what is the reason for having an osteopathic school if they turn out doctors who practice the exact same what an MD does. Or is the DO method of practice greatly different from an MD?
I ask this because I've heard some say they are basically the same....others say they are different. If the same then why two different types of schools? If they are different then different how? Should I ask my doctor if he is an MD or DO. Is it important to know if one is an MD or DO? Do I want MD treatment or DO treatment? Is it important that patients know if you are an MD or a DO?
I ask this because I've heard some say they are basically the same....others say they are different. If the same then why two different types of schools? If they are different then different how? Should I ask my doctor if he is an MD or DO. Is it important to know if one is an MD or DO? Do I want MD treatment or DO treatment? Is it important that patients know if you are an MD or a DO?