- Joined
- Oct 19, 2016
- Messages
- 212
- Reaction score
- 146
Is it 5? 4? 3? What is a good number where you can say you will matriculate?
Is it 5? 4? 3? What is a good number where you can say you will matriculate?
Unless you are an automaton.
HAHA!!!! I didn't even apply to that many schools
"Interviews 3, a doctor you will be"... statistically speaking.
But no number of interviews guarantees matriculation or acceptance.
🙁
Doctorbob23 had 33 interview invites, but he wasn't concerned when he was at #9.
Is he still around, I havent seen him post in a while. I wonder which baller school he will be attending.Doctorbob23 had 33 interview invites, but he wasn't concerned when he was at #9.
I can't really argue. I am a beautiful human beingOne is all you theoretically and hypothetically need young gromothy. I have had one interview and got accepted. I have been doing some serious research though on very very reliable sources that say the correlation coefficient between attractiveness/10 and acceptances post-interview is near .903.
so based on very scientifically sound logic, me and @Healer@1994 are both 10/10's
/dun goofing
Lol I don't think he is.Is he still around, I havent seen him post in a while. I wonder which baller school he will be attending.
40% of matriculants in 2015 attended 2 interviews or less. Nearly half of matriculants had a only received a single acceptance offer
I've realized that you never stop feeling anxious, no matter the amount of II you receive... It's not until you get that first (and possibly only) acceptance that you can finally breathe a sigh of relief.
Exactly my feelings!!! I just need to know that I will be an MD.
I've realized that you never stop feeling anxious, no matter the amount of II you receive... It's not until you get that first (and possibly only) acceptance that you can finally breathe a sigh of relief.
You are by definition realistic about your school list if you have received three IIs over a cycle.Unless you have a terrible personality, seems like 3 IIs should get you in, so long as you were realistic in your school list.
You are by definition realistic about your school list if you have received three IIs over a cycle.
It's possible, but it's very unlikely you get rejected from multiple schools post rejection without some serious ii performance issues. Especially this early in the cycle.Probably. I always wonder if a person who was on the lower end of a top-tier applicant might get many interviews at top tier schools and not get in due to not throwing in more than one safety schools?
I don't think the app is her issue if she received 7 interviews. IMHO.I have a friend who interviewed at 7 schools last year... and was waitlisted or rejected from all of them and is re-applying this cycle. It's giving me nightmares because she herself and the rest of us all thought that she'd be fine with that many interviews.
I mean why would schools do all the work and expend all the resources to reject you? Later in the cycle waitlist is a possibility. But it doesn't make a lot of sense to invite people you want to reject.Are IIs often misleading? Like maybe you are already ranked lower than the majority of their other interviewees but they still sent you an II anyway....in which case they know they would WL/reject you...but in the rare chance that you amaze them with an astonishing performance on your interview day then they would accept you? So basically you're already a doomed WL/reject with an II but they just wanted to give you that tiny chance to amaze them.
Here is an example. During a recent ii I sat with a few candidates. 3/5 of them were social talked to each other were polite and followed social Norma to be expected from all professionals. One of them had difficulty keeping conversation, eye contact or even answer questions I would ask them. It was obvious that the person was terribly shy. The other candidate made a clearly inappropriate political comment to the dean, and was acerbic, curt, rude and a general know-it-all condescending to other students. Which candidates do you think will be marked negatively if these characteristics' continued to be displayed during the interview?
The terribly shy person has difficulty picking up social cues. Probably will during the interview as well. The rude person may behave, but that person asked a ridiculously political question during q and a from the dean. That person in all liklihood does not realize that they can rub people the wrong way or that medical school interview q and a are not the place to ask politically charged questions.I don't know...my interview settings were different. Everyone behaved and the dean didn't really walk around or observe. I think you're placing too much emphasis on the pre-interview settings. If the guy that was being rude was inappropriate then yea of course...but these are rare situations...most interviewees behave. It's the private interviews that matters and we can't observe that.
The terribly shy person has difficulty picking up social cues. Probably will during the interview as well. The rude person may behave, but that person asked a ridiculously political question during q and a from the dean. That person in all liklihood does not realize that they can rub people the wrong way or that medical school interview q and a are not the place to ask politically charged questions.
I'd rather not say the exact question. Let's just say it was political in nature.What was the question?
I have to agree...especially for schools with something like 25-30% post interview acceptance rate I have a hard time believing that 75% of people were awful, awkward, terrible interviewers. The opinion on here sometimes seems to sway too hard toward "the interview is just to make sure that you're able to hold a conversation"the stories of people with 3+ IIs and then all rejections/waitlists scares the fck out of me
i have a hard time believing that those stories are just because the person was a terrible interviewer since i have simply never met anyone like that on the trail thus far
Exactly. though tbh ive been on the other side of the table, interviewing people, and could make a laundry list of things i would dock points for. (hard to engage with, not excited about the school, roundabout answers, rambling etc.)I have to agree...especially for schools with something like 25-30% post interview acceptance rate I have a hard time believing that 75% of people were awful, awkward, terrible interviewers. The opinion on here sometimes seems to sway too hard toward "the interview is just to make sure that you're able to hold a conversation"
Then again I am not the one doing the interviewing so maybe people that seem normal outside of the interview freeze up and forget how to speak
That's the thing, if people are arrogant enough or don't possess the maturity to self assess for social interactions issues how do you expect those people to hit all the important pieces like being excited about the school and such. Seems like some people might get weeded out.Exactly. though tbh ive been on the other side of the table, interviewing people, and could make a laundry list of things i would dock points for. (hard to engage with, not excited about the school, roundabout answers, rambling etc.)
but points from that list wouldnt be representative of someone who just needed to hold a conversation
the stories of people with 3+ IIs and then all rejections/waitlists scares the fck out of me
i have a hard time believing that those stories are just because the person was a terrible interviewer since i have simply never met anyone like that on the trail thus far
The question: Who are you voting for and why?I'd rather not say the exact question. Let's just say it was political in nature.
having said that tho, looking at the notes my interviewers make on their sheets. 99% of the time it is literally a regurgitation of my answers to their questions. but at that level im certainly just thinking too far into it. some interviewers were kind enough to say things like "those are excellent answers/ideas/thoughts" but for the most part they've just been conversational with 1 person writing down things that come up.That's the thing, if people are arrogant enough or don't possess the maturity to self assess for social interactions issues how do you expect those people to hit all the important pieces like being excited about the school and such. Seems like some people might get weeded out.
Most of my interviewers barely write any notes. One marked on my passion , the other regurgitated that I would be a great fit for the school. Idk. It makes no sense to me to invite people to reject. It's costly to do That for the school.having said that tho, looking at the notes my interviewers make on their sheets. 99% of the time it is literally a regurgitation of my answers to their questions. but at that level im certainly just thinking too far into it. some interviewers were kind enough to say things like "those are excellent answers/ideas/thoughts" but for the most part they've just been conversational with 1 person writing down things that come up.
i think it depends on how the office runs things. mine had little printed out questions with boxes for them to fill out like an assignment lolMost of my interviewers barely write any notes. I had a weird off tangent discussion about usmle and mcat correlations with one.
Honestly the question was just as stupid. Medical school interviews are not the place for activismThe question: Who are you voting for and why?
The follow-up: Wow, that's dumb.
![]()
Observing other people at my pre-interview was fascinating. Like you said, it was really easy to spot the 1-2 who were going to shoot themselves in the foot. If you don't have that person at your interview....then it's probably you 😳Here is an example. During a recent ii I sat with a few candidates. 3/5 of them were social talked to each other were polite and followed social Norma to be expected from all professionals. One of them had difficulty keeping conversation, eye contact or even answer questions I would ask them. It was obvious that the person was terribly shy. The other candidate made a clearly inappropriate political comment to the dean, and was acerbic, curt, rude and a general know-it-all condescending to other students. Which candidates do you think will be marked negatively if these characteristics' continued to be displayed during the interview?
Out of curiosity, why did you expect that of him? Bad social skills?I know a guy who interviewed at 12 schools last year and only got into one. And that's about what I would've expected if you told me he would've interviewed at 12. On the other hand, I know a guy who went 8 for 8. There's no magic formula.
Hahah. One of my mmi the interviewer went rogue and off script . I wonder how that is going to impact me.i think it depends on how the office runs things. mine had little printed out questions with boxes for them to fill out like an assignment lol
tbh it really made me feel like i was on the better side of the interviewing table.
SAME! they weren't supposed to ask questions or anything but he decided to ask completely unrelated questions about my work/research etc hahaHahah. One of my mmi the interviewer went rogue and off script . I wonder how that is going to impact me.
I rolled with it , but I think it was kind of an unfair thing to do.SAME! they weren't supposed to ask questions or anything but he decided to ask completely unrelated questions about my work/research etc haha
Exactly. though tbh ive been on the other side of the table, interviewing people, and could make a laundry list of things i would dock points for. (hard to engage with, not excited about the school, roundabout answers, rambling etc.)
but points from that list wouldnt be representative of someone who just needed to hold a conversation