- Joined
- Sep 17, 2011
- Messages
- 827
- Reaction score
- 16
I am finishing a terminal master's in clinical psychology after a career change. I am applying to PhD programs for fall 2012, including a mix of clinical, counseling, and experimental psychology programs. I have found that I primarily am interested in health psychology research. I am minimally interested in clinical/practice work, but pursued this path because I am older and need a way to support myself if I do not get into a PhD program. One of the experimental programs I applied to was with a POI who has been a close mentor for several years. It is the exact research I want to do. However, after the interview (of which I did not interview with my POI, only other faculty with fringe interests who each mentioned my mentorship by my POI and therefore assumed a non-primary interest in their labs), I was told that my interests were basically too clinical and therefore not a fit.
Besides being disillusioned by the "lack of fit" (which makes no sense to me, as this is the best fit I can imagine), I'm thrown off by the fact that my research interests are considered 'too clinical'. I have my own ideas about what 'clinical research' is, but what say all of you? Is it working with the mentally ill? Doing psychotherapy and/or diagnostic research? Something else? What would distinguish clinical from pure health psych research??
Besides being disillusioned by the "lack of fit" (which makes no sense to me, as this is the best fit I can imagine), I'm thrown off by the fact that my research interests are considered 'too clinical'. I have my own ideas about what 'clinical research' is, but what say all of you? Is it working with the mentally ill? Doing psychotherapy and/or diagnostic research? Something else? What would distinguish clinical from pure health psych research??