- Joined
- Mar 3, 2007
- Messages
- 151
- Reaction score
- 0
If you were an admissions person, give an example of what you would define as "great experience". Make up a hypothetical candidate if you will.
not sure about "great," but i've been told by adcoms that my is experience is "rich" and "varied," and it is my experiences that everyone wants to talk about in my interviews... and, b/c i am average (as a prevet student) in terms of grades and gres, i think this is what stands out on my application
animal - 8 years as a vet asst in a small animal hospital; 1 quarter wildlife trapping techniques; 200 hours banding birds; 2 summers trapping mosquitoes for west nile virus studies
life - tons of volunteer experience in human world; leadership experience in the wildlife society and environmental groups; worked at leprosy colony and home for the dying in india, humanity work throughout latin america, stint as a nun; worked in infectious diseases for major university as project manager (grant/manuscript/protocol guru) for 7 years; west nile virus research on the side
hope this helps - not that you should go out and try to become a nun before next year, but i think varied and well-rounded is what they are really looking for - a dedication to both animals AND humans (which in my book are animals too)!!
Try to get a variety of experiences - large animal, small animal, wildlife, research, clinical, you get the idea. The VMCAS application has check boxes for the types of animals you worked with in each experience, and many schools look to see that you've got a variety.
I don't really want to judge here and say that this is the wrong thing to do, and another tactic is right, but be careful that they don't see through this. All schools are aware that any student with food animal experience could potentially say they want to pursue it, but unless your story is convincing they may suspect you of lying to get in.
Relatedly, although I agree with cyrille that doing research is a great experience to have and will definitely broaden your perspective of science and vet med, don't do research or say you want to be a lab animal vet just to get in (like food animal, there is a shortage of people in that field and stating that interest *could* give you an edge). Loads of people do undergrad research projects, but few actually want to make a career of it - hence the shortage. Get the experience, be proud of it, be able to talk about it, but be honest if it's not what you ultimately want to do ("I'm thankful to have had that experience and seen that side of veterinary medicine, and it's made me really respect the people who work to discover and develop the technology I'll use in my career as a private practice vet...").I wouldn't recommend saying that you want to be a food animal vet to get in, because as cyrille said they'll see the quality and quantity of your food animal experience and can probably correlate that with your true desires. Also, its probably best not to lie just to boost your chances.
I don't really want to judge here and say that this is the wrong thing to do, and another tactic is right, but be careful that they don't see through this. All schools are aware that any student with food animal experience could potentially say they want to pursue it, but unless your story is convincing they may suspect you of lying to get in.
The only thing my interviewers wanted to hear about, and every single one was SO excited and interested to talk to me about was: The 40 hours I volunteered at the local SPCA during Hurricane Katrina when we had a large influx of animals from Louisiana come in.
I was totally expecting to be asked why I hadn't had more diverse experience, or why I had chosen small animal and equine experience, or something like that. Maybe asked about the 10 years I managed a horse boarding facility that I opened up when I was 16? Nope. 3 years assisting small animal surgeries as a vet tech? Not interested.
Just because they didn't ask doesn't mean they weren't interested. Maybe they felt they had all the need to know about that based on your application.
It's the same with grades, LORs and other things, they may not bring it up in an interview but don't think they don't care about them.
Just because they didn't ask doesn't mean they weren't interested. Maybe they felt they had all the need to know about that based on your application.
It's the same with grades, LORs and other things, they may not bring it up in an interview but don't think they don't care about them.
Definitely!! The broader the better! All schools I talked to told me that the applicant should try to get a broad experience
The only thing my interviewers wanted to hear about, and every single one was SO excited and interested to talk to me about was: The 40 hours I volunteered at the local SPCA during Hurricane Katrina when we had a large influx of animals from Louisiana come in. Thats it.
My teaching experience stood out (few vet school candidates teach on the Mexican border) more than my research experience (many vet candidates have research projects), and I think it really helped me get in.
Whaaaaaat? Cyrille? Hasn't it been nearly two years since your last post? And what's this business?
? It depends. What did you during these experiences? Did you actually care for the animal? Or were you a mere observer? Were you able to perform any procedures- handling, nail trims, blood collection, cytologies? If you cared for an animal, performed procedures, and had quality one on one time with a veterinarian, I would call that a quality experienceso basically my SA, equine, and food animal experience are pennies.....awesome. *facepalm*
so basically my SA, equine, and food animal experience are pennies.....awesome. *facepalm*