What is PAT most similar to?

[Dentman1]

---

Members don't see this ad.

What is the Pat section of the real test most similar to? Is is acheiver, topscore or CDP? I feel that acheiver is very hard. Specifically I wanted to know about the pattern folding and keyhole questions.

 

[OC1314]

Hey guys, I also wanted to know about the size and resolution. Is it similar to CDP or Achiever because the achiever objects look small and have bad resolution.

 

[DrReo]

CDP is an excellent representative sample, in general. I felt everything was easier, except angle rankings on the DAT were more difficult.

 

[doc3232]

CDP is an excellent representative sample, in general. I felt everything was easier, except angle rankings on the DAT were more difficult.

I completely disagree. I thought real DAT angles were a joke...
I felt most sections were similar or a bit easier.

 

[jdm789]

I completely disagree. I thought real DAT angles were a joke...
I felt most sections were similar or a bit easier.

joke as in easy or hard? were the angles and hole punching on the real DAT harder or easier than CDP? those are my two tough sections

 

[LTami]

I completely disagree. I thought real DAT angles were a joke...
I felt most sections were similar or a bit easier.

I agree with you. some ppl said angle ranking on real DAT would be much more difficult. It is not to me. I think they are pretty easy. In think the first 2 sections of PAT on DAT Achiever are more difficult than the real one. I would combine it with crack the pat to study for this section.

 

[DrReo]

I completely disagree. I thought real DAT angles were a joke...
I felt most sections were similar or a bit easier.

Well, there is more than one exam. .

If you're doing well on CDP, you'll do fine.