For those who are "partners" in their pain groups,
1. How did you earn it or buy in
2. How are you paid
3. Do you have equal votes on decisions with the other partners?
Medical Practice Partnership
Buy-In Framework, Compensation Model, and Partnership Philosophy
Purpose
The goal is to establish consistent language and expectations so that buy-in discussions proceed smoothly and without misunderstanding.
Components of a Buy-In Transaction
A buy-in transaction can be understood in three parts: the cover charge, the accounts receivable transition, and the reserve ante.
1. Practice Valuation (The Cover Charge)
A formal practice valuation informs but does not solely determine the purchase price for a buy-in. The valuation establishes a baseline from which the partners negotiate.
For example, if a practice is valued at $1 million, a 25% partnership share would carry a cover charge of $250,000. This is the price of admission to the partnership table.
Deferred bonuses and accrued vacation cannot be applied toward the cover charge, as doing so could create potential tax liability.
The cover charge may be financed internally by existing partners at their discretion, or externally by the incoming partner, who pays it upfront.
2. Accounts Receivable Transition
All accounts receivable generated by the associate physician prior to the buy-in remain with the existing company and its prior owners.
Becoming a partner means starting fresh. The new partner begins building new receivables from the date of their partnership onward.
3. Reserve Contribution (The Ante)
The practice maintains approximately up to 3 months of operating capital in cash reserves as a standard business practice.
The incoming partner must contribute their pro rata share of the reserve before they are eligible to receive distributions under the compensation model.
For example, if the company maintains $400,000 in reserves, a full-share 4th partner would ante up $100,000 (25%) before being eligible for distributions.
Physician Compensation Model
The compensation model progresses through four phases, each reflecting a different stage of the physician’s financial relationship with the practice.
Phase 1: Subsidization
The new physician receives predictable, fixed compensation (salary or guaranteed draw) from the existing owners while their patient base and accounts receivable mature. This phase provides stability during the ramp-up period and lasts for a defined timeframe agreed upon in advance.
Phase 2: Productivity
Compensation shifts to a percentage of collections. This phase continues until the subsidy costs and sunk costs incurred by the existing owners have been recouped. The duration is directly tied to the length of the subsidization phase.
Phase 3: Equity / Partnership
The physician transitions to the full cost-allocation proforma used by the partnership. Compensation is now determined by the practice’s financial model, which accounts for both direct and indirect overhead, and includes profit-sharing as defined by the partners.
Phase 4: Risk Sharing
The partner is fully exposed to both the upside and downside of business performance. Compensation incorporates the cost-allocation model plus the allocation of revenue and profit from ancillary service lines. This is the mature, long-term compensation structure of a full partner.
Partnership Philosophy
Beyond the mechanics of transactions and compensation, the quality of a partnership depends on shared values, mutual commitment, and clear expectations. The following principles should guide the formation and maintenance of partnerships.
The Model Serves the Mission
A compensation model is ultimately just numbers on a spreadsheet—it can be adjusted as needed. However, the model should reflect the ground truth of the business’s financial dynamics and articulate a philosophy of effort and reward that promotes productivity. As the saying goes:
“Show me your budget, and I’ll tell you your values.”
Anticipate Part-Time Production
Partners may work part-time for many legitimate reasons—family commitments, health, work-life balance, sabbatical, or professional development. The compensation model should anticipate and accommodate this scenario rather than treating it as an exception. Failing to prepare for this reality is preparing for conflict.
That said, the terms “full-time” and “part-time” deserve careful definition. Hours available for clinical duties differ from revenue production. A week of high-volume procedural work will produce different financial results than a week spent staffing new patients with APPs, handling administrative tasks, cultivating new business-development relationships, or supervising behavioral-health providers. The practice should determine whether full-time status is measured by clinical hours, administrative contribution, revenue targets, or some hybrid threshold.
“It isn’t glamorous, but cleaning horse stalls is good for the horse.”
Autonomy Is a Partnership Privilege
Control over one’s schedule and production is a benefit reserved for partners who have earned their seat at the table. Non-partner employed providers should commit to full-time work—both legs and butt in the canoe, oars in the water, rowing the boat. Understanding the chain of command is mission-critical. Experience has shown that employment arrangements with providers who do not share the partnership’s passion, commitment, and thirst for adventure for growing the practice often fail to endure, even when those individuals make meaningful short-term contributions.
“Many hands make for light work.”
Character Matters
The quality, success, and satisfaction of any business partnership may be best predicted by each partner’s relational style. Individuals who bond and separate well from others, who are skilled at creating community, who avoid self-defeating and self-destructive behavior, and who approach relationships from a place of security tend to make the best partners. When evaluating a potential partner, consider not just their clinical skills and productivity, but also how they form and maintain relationships, their personal "origin story," and family history.
“We are only as needy as our unmet needs.”