I just want to know what specialization will get you the least hours with the most flexibility. The work can be of any intensity, just so long as there aren't too many hours per week. Thank you.
I just want to know what specialization will get you the least hours with the most flexibility. The work can be of any intensity, just so long as there aren't too many hours per week. Thank you.
I just want to know what specialization will get you the least hours with the most flexibility. The work can be of any intensity, just so long as there aren't too many hours per week. Thank you.
If you don't want to work hard, medicine is not the field for you. But in general, the specialties that are most competitive (derm, rads, rad onc) are those with the 'best' hours.
I'm pretty sure the OP stated that the work itself can be of any intensity....
I'm a very hard worker but I definitely prefer working my butt off if it means fewer hours....more time to spend with my family, friends, and on the vball court 🙂
neurosurgery.
I lol'd.
This thread is a Burnett's Law fat, hanging curveball.
I just want to know what specialization will get you the least hours with the most flexibility. The work can be of any intensity, just so long as there aren't too many hours per week. Thank you.
I see this Burnett's Law mentioned often. Can you link me to some explanation of what it is, broseph?
I see this Burnett's Law mentioned often. Can you link me to some explanation of what it is, broseph?
Derm, then EM comes to mind. The former is ultracompetitive to match into; EM, not as much, but still requires a solid application.
Frazier, you're going to be a horrible doctor.
🙄The ultimate answer to this is set up your own practice and set your own hours
/thread
🙄
overhead
I just want to know what specialization will get you the least hours with the most flexibility. The work can be of any intensity, just so long as there aren't too many hours per week. Thank you.
At the moment it's Doctors of Law because the market and the economy can't absorb anymore lawyers
@Toff4l: You also have to get the grades to get into it
women doctors. they get pregnant, and start working part-time.
Really? No one's jumped all over this sexist bigot yet? 😡 I'll have you know not all women want children and not all fathers decide to be absent from their home life because of their careers.
That being said, family and/or laziness do not usually mix well with a career in medicine. Sounds like it's not for the OP.
Besides hospitalist, emergency med, and intensivist, other shiftwork docs who have more control over their schedules are laborists (OBGYN) and neonatologists (pediatrics).EM is a good example because of the shift-work. You can just do 2-3 shifts a week and have the rest of the time off.
IM you can be a hospitalist and work similar shifts. Same for critical care.
Besides hospitalist, emergency med, and intensivist, other shiftwork docs who have more control over their schedules are laborists (OBGYN) and neonatologists (pediatrics).
didn't imply either of those. Think about it though logistically. If medical schools train males and females at a 1:1 ratio, and a percentage of those women become stay-at-home moms, or more likely, start working part time and taking time off to rear children, this contributes to a future shortages of physicians (srs). Not proposing changing anything, but jus sayin...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/features/article7120486.ece
Nope, sorry. It's obvious what you meant the first time and you're not going to be able to take it back by posting an article trying to explain away your inappropriate response to a post.
I think you may have some problems in this world if you are going to dismiss others based on their gender, sexuality, skin color, or nationality. At least, I sure hope you do.
This is an SDN joke. There was a discussion about it a while back. You should search for it and maybe his reference will sink in a bit more.Nope, sorry. It's obvious what you meant the first time and you're not going to be able to take it back by posting an article trying to explain away your inappropriate response to a post.
I think you may have some problems in this world if you are going to dismiss others based on their gender, sexuality, skin color, or nationality. At least, I sure hope you do.
Nope, sorry. It's obvious what you meant the first time and you're not going to be able to take it back by posting an article trying to explain away your inappropriate response to a post.
I think you may have some problems in this world if you are going to dismiss others based on their gender, sexuality, skin color, or nationality. At least, I sure hope you do.
o rly? I thought being able to find a gig doing shift-work in neonatology was rare due to the need for continued care.
Continued care is provided by all the partners in the neonatology group. Of course, a solo doc or small group wouldn't have the luxury of well-defined hours.o rly? I thought being able to find a gig doing shift-work in neonatology was rare due to the need for continued care.
Really? No one's jumped all over this sexist bigot yet? 😡 I'll have you know not all women want children and not all fathers decide to be absent from their home life because of their careers.
That being said, family and/or laziness do not usually mix well with a career in medicine. Sounds like it's not for the OP.
Nope, sorry. It's obvious what you meant the first time and you're not going to be able to take it back by posting an article trying to explain away your inappropriate response to a post.
I think you may have some problems in this world if you are going to dismiss others based on their gender, sexuality, skin color, or nationality. At least, I sure hope you do.
didn't imply either of those. Think about it though logistically. If medical schools train males and females at a 1:1 ratio, and a percentage of those women become stay-at-home moms, or more likely, start working part time and taking time off to rear children, this contributes to a future shortages of physicians (srs). Not proposing changing anything, but jus sayin...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/features/article7120486.ece