- Joined
- Apr 25, 2006
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 0
Now that the interview trail is about to begin...I have recently wondered how to determine what makes a residency program "good" and what makes one "bad"? After searching through the websites for the programs I've applied to, they all sound about the same. The differences I've noted include the curriculum (minor variations), call schedule and maybe a particular "track", ie urban underserved, rural, etc. How can we determine what makes a GOOD residency program? I also recognize that the environment and personalities in the program can make or break it, but does anyone have some advice on what questions we should be asking current residents and faculty at the programs we are interested in?
( I just learned that a couple of the programs I've applied to are undergoing leadership changes--one residency director quit and a faculty member resigned from another program b/c she was burnt out...i suppose you could look at either change as good or bad for those respective programs, but it also makes me leery of putting my efforts into seriously considering training at those places.)
Thanks for your input!
( I just learned that a couple of the programs I've applied to are undergoing leadership changes--one residency director quit and a faculty member resigned from another program b/c she was burnt out...i suppose you could look at either change as good or bad for those respective programs, but it also makes me leery of putting my efforts into seriously considering training at those places.)
Thanks for your input!