- Joined
- Jun 28, 2006
- Messages
- 1,023
- Reaction score
- 275
From what I gathered this bill will only add yag capsulotomy, LPI, SLT, chalazia removal. Many of the other procedures you mentioned were specifically excluded from the bill.
I really think this whole surgery thing is a red herring.
I practice in a state (Connecticut) that while does not have surgical rights has a very wide scope of practice and always has.
IF I were to do any sort of laser surgeries, the only one that would even be remotely "worth it" would be refractive surgery and even with that, I see at best 2-3 patients per month who are even remotely interested in it. That bubble has long since burst. So I sure as heck ain't going to be spending a million bucks to build out a surgical suite for my 2 LASIK patients per month.
Maybe I see a couple of patients a month who could use a PI. Again, nowhere close to the volume needed to make any sort of laser equipment economically viable.
I have a great relationship with every optometrist I've ever met or worked with. Nobody wants to do these procedures...which is why I don't understand the reasoning behind these types of bills being pushed through. There's a misconception somewhere that doctors, ophthalmologists make money by doing surgery. We make money by doing a lot of the same thing very efficiently and very well. Primary care physicians see patients for a myriad of problems and visits end up taking 30 minutes+ (as they should since their problems are complicated and diverse). That's frankly why their compensation is relatively poor.