What to do when your interviewer goes off topic.

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Pkboi24

Don't laugh at my SN
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2005
Messages
1,139
Reaction score
14
I just got back from my interview at Texas Tech. My first interviewer didn't seem to want to talk about me as an applicant, rather he kept on talking about his own research, after which we talked about experiemental treatment on AIDS.

So I finally ask him, "Are there any questions you'd like to ask me?"

"Well, there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with your applicantion...Oh wait, I have a question for you."

*takes out a pen and paper*

"Draw an amino acid for me."

WHAT!?

"Okay...um..I suppose I'll attempt to draw the simplest one..."

So I drew glycine and got it right. Unfortunately, he didn't like that it took me so long to draw it. He goes on to say that I'm suppose to know stuff like this.

Next time my interviewer goes off topic, I think I'm just going to let him be...
 
If he goes off topic follow him off topic. Let the interviewer lead.
 
I just got back from my interview at Texas Tech. My first interviewer didn't seem to want to talk about me as an applicant, rather he kept on talking about his own research, after which we talked about experiemental treatment on AIDS.

So I finally ask him, "Are there any questions you'd like to ask me?"

"Well, there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with your applicantion...Oh wait, I have a question for you."

*takes out a pen and paper*

"Draw an amino acid for me."

WHAT!?

"Okay...um..I suppose I'll attempt to draw the simplest one..."

So I drew glycine and got it right. Unfortunately, he didn't like that it took me so long to draw it. He goes on to say that I'm suppose to know stuff like this.

Next time my interviewer goes off topic, I think I'm just going to let him be...


You should have just made a tiny dot on the page and said it was a scale model. That way you could have gotten credit for a more complicated one, and it would take you no time to draw.
 
Well I've only been to one and it was closed file. So there was a lot of getting off topic. But I didn't really have a problem with that. Both of my interviewers were super nice and the interview was very conversational. I don't really think spending half my interview talking to my student interviewer about the new MCAT will hurt me too much as long as she liked me.
 
Well I've only been to one and it was closed file. So there was a lot of getting off topic. But I didn't really have a problem with that. Both of my interviewers were super nice and the interview was very conversational. I don't really think spending half my interview talking to my student interviewer about the new MCAT will hurt me too much as long as she liked me.

Yeah, I want them to like me, but there's a difference between liking me as a person and liking me as an applicant. My interviewers have to present me to the admissions committee and I'd like them to have a little more to say than "He was a pleasant fellow."
 
So I finally ask him, "Are there any questions you'd like to ask me?"

FWIW, this is a rookie mistake. The absolute BEST interview is one that isn't an interview at all, it is a conversation. You should not have tried so hard to make it into an interview, and gotten out of there while you were ahead.
 
Yeah, I want them to like me, but there's a difference between liking me as a person and liking me as an applicant. My interviewers have to present me to the admissions committee and I'd like them to have a little more to say than "He was a pleasant fellow."

Well, they already know a lot about you. Some interviewers are only interested in your ability to communicate with others since for the most part that is the missing piece in your application. This seems especially true if their aren't any real inconsistencies in your application. Think about it: how many personal statements don't tell them why we want to pursue this career? how many fail to tell them what we find important? how many applications don't give them an idea of what we've done to pursue this path?

Personally I would be happy to not have to go through the irritation of explaining it all again and just let them find out something new.

If your interviewer finds you likeable as a person he will figure out how to present you to the commitee. Remember, he is evaluating what could be a future student or colleague, he probably wants competent people he enjoys the company of, since you made it to interview you are a competent and viable candidate.

BTW: I was at tech that day too, and the flavor I got from them was: if there isn't anything deficient or inconsistent about your app, they just wanted to meet you and have a pleasant conversation.
 
Yeah, I want them to like me, but there's a difference between liking me as a person and liking me as an applicant. My interviewers have to present me to the admissions committee and I'd like them to have a little more to say than "He was a pleasant fellow."

He was probably getting more out of you as an applicant with that conversation than you realize. I wouldn't have said anything.
 
Next time my interviewer goes off topic, I think I'm just going to let him be...
There isn't really a "topic" as such. There's a million ways an interviewer will try to get an impression of you. Not all do a standard Q&A. I'd recommend letting the interviewer lead and then just follow. regardless of the tune.
 
I don't think you should ever ask your interviewer if they have any more questions for you. However, if he goes off-topic so much that you feel he hasn't learned anything about you, I think it's okay to stop him at the very end of the interview and bring up the things about you that you really would like him to know. For example, if you want to make sure your interviewer gains a sense of how much you love research, you could say something like, "Well, this has been a great conversation, but before this conversation is over, I just make sure you know how much I love this school... I'm really impressed by the research facilities, and my research experiences have been such an important part of who I am..." or whatever it is that you need to say in order to steer the conversation onto ground that you want to make sure to cover. Basically, you should figure out ahead of time a couple of things that you absolutely want your interviewer to know about you; then bring those things up at the end of the interview if the interviewer's questions didn't already cover them. I don't think the posters who are advising you to let the interviewer lead the whole time are 100% correct. You're there to sell yourself, not just to passively respond to questions. I think it's important for an interviewee to sound like a person who knows himself and is ready to take some initiative.

I mean, how do you know whether the admissions committee thought there were inconsistencies in your application or not? Let's say, for example, that one of your LOR writers mentioned something that doesn't show up in the rest of your application, and now your interviewer is waiting to see if you'll bring it up. So bring it up, just in case. It's possible that if you don't bring it up, your interviewer will conclude that you weren't so passionate about it after all, and this will be a black mark against you. In short, it doesn't hurt to re-iterate a couple of the points that the interviewer might already know about you. Sometimes personal statements sound contrived and interviewers want to hear it from the horse's mouth.
 
There isn't really a "topic" as such. There's a million ways an interviewer will try to get an impression of you. Not all do a standard Q&A. I'd recommend letting the interviewer lead and then just follow. regardless of the tune.

Well, I guess I'm not getting into Tech...oh well...
 
Well, I guess I'm not getting into Tech...oh well...

Don't hang up your gloves too early, you won't know until they send you that ugly letter. So don't count yourself out yet.

Maybe he was just messing with you in response to your question. He seemed to like you enough to engage you in pleasant conversation for most of the interview; I'd say that's a positive sign. As a project manager, whenever I asked anyone a technical question during an interview, it was to see how they handled my "toss", which tells me about how they think and how they handle pressure.

Either way, now you know more about how to handle such stuff.
 
IMO when he asked you to draw an amino acid, instead of actually drawing out a specific one you could engage him as you drew it, like draw the amino and carboxyl group, explain the additional group that defines the specific amino acid, and then draw the simplest one.

Its what I would do. And it shows that you understand the structure and concept of an amino acid, rather than just showing that you memorized one of them.

Although during an interview i would probably have a temporary brain freeze and do something stupid 🙁
 
IMO when he asked you to draw an amino acid, instead of actually drawing out a specific one you could engage him as you drew it, like draw the amino and carboxyl group, explain the additional group that defines the specific amino acid, and then draw the simplest one.

Its what I would do. And it shows that you understand the structure and concept of an amino acid, rather than just showing that you memorized one of them.

Although during an interview i would probably have a temporary brain freeze and do something stupid 🙁

👍 I was thinking the same.
 
FWIW, this is a rookie mistake. The absolute BEST interview is one that isn't an interview at all, it is a conversation. You should not have tried so hard to make it into an interview, and gotten out of there while you were ahead.
Not to beat a dead horse, but that's similar to what I was thinking when I read the OP's OP. I was thinking more like, "What was he thinking asking something like that?"
 
Don't sweat it, maybe sometimes they just want to see how you handle surprise and pressure.

When I was at tech, the interviewer and me spend most of the time talking about disaster management, the whole thing lasted about 45 minutes, he wasn't busy, it was quite a pleasant conversation.

I just got back from my interview at Texas Tech. My first interviewer didn't seem to want to talk about me as an applicant, rather he kept on talking about his own research, after which we talked about experiemental treatment on AIDS.

So I finally ask him, "Are there any questions you'd like to ask me?"

"Well, there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with your applicantion...Oh wait, I have a question for you."

*takes out a pen and paper*

"Draw an amino acid for me."

WHAT!?

"Okay...um..I suppose I'll attempt to draw the simplest one..."

So I drew glycine and got it right. Unfortunately, he didn't like that it took me so long to draw it. He goes on to say that I'm suppose to know stuff like this.

Next time my interviewer goes off topic, I think I'm just going to let him be...
 
all topics are on-topic. they want to see if you can be communicated with as a human being. not listen to you talk about yourself. 🙂
 
all topics are on-topic. they want to see if you can be communicated with as a human being. not listen to you talk about yourself. 🙂

Bingo. Personally, I'd be very happy to have an interview where the interviewer felt at ease with me to talk at length about him/herself. I get credit for showing up, s/he gets to talk about...whatever, and at the end, there are no sour feelings.
 
I just got back from my interview at Texas Tech. My first interviewer didn't seem to want to talk about me as an applicant, rather he kept on talking about his own research, after which we talked about experiemental treatment on AIDS.

So I finally ask him, "Are there any questions you'd like to ask me?"

"Well, there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with your applicantion...Oh wait, I have a question for you."

*takes out a pen and paper*

"Draw an amino acid for me."

WHAT!?

"Okay...um..I suppose I'll attempt to draw the simplest one..."

So I drew glycine and got it right. Unfortunately, he didn't like that it took me so long to draw it. He goes on to say that I'm suppose to know stuff like this.

Next time my interviewer goes off topic, I think I'm just going to let him be...

Pkboi24 you're answer to the question is right here... He didn't ask you to draw the Amino Acid because he was testing you... He was responding to your rude manner... I don't even have to ask if you came off "smug" when saying, "So I finally ask him, "Are there any questions you'd like to ask me?"

YOU did and he effectivley took your application and threw it into the garbage... The Amino acid was just his way of saying, " you think you're so good and smart that you dont' even have to participate in intellectual conversation, then do me a favor and show me how smart you are and draw something as simple as an Amino Acid... which I would have gotten wrong because what if I didn't take that class as of yet??? So I think the question was just ******ed... "

Listen, When in Rome do as the Romans do... not as the Turks or Eskimos if you know what I mean....

It is OK because at least you got an interview. work on your humility and interests.
 
you'll probably still get in. at least he'll remember you.

ps-i had to look up how to draw one, since i haven't learned that yet. paranoid.
 
you'll probably still get in. at least he'll remember you.

ps-i had to look up how to draw one, since i haven't learned that yet. paranoid.

The point is... A fully legitimate candidate could have gone to that interview and not either had the class to learn that or will ever take a class to learn that. A bio degree is not required for Med school. With that said, the fact he ASKED the interviewer to ask him something one could say, "he got what he asked for." Although whether he liked it is a whole other story.
 
I would say “well, I’ve only known one.” I would proceed to draw a middle-eastern man and name him: Amine O’acid (pronounced A-meen Oh aceed). Just to spice things up I’d throw in some commentary about where he comes from, what his family is like, and his personal views on the American healthcare system. Just to cover my bases I might give him a generic amino acid tattoo. It’s true that this is risky…but I look at it this way; the interview is supposed to be about you as a doctor, not how many amino acids you can draw, how many Latin terms you can spout off, or how many push-ups you can do. I’m not saying that the interviewer doesn’t have the right to ask the question, but he/she would only put you on the spot like this to throw you off, put you under pressure, and see what you do. I think that turning it into something humorous would show that you CAN think under pressure, that you have a sense of humor, and that you’re willing to do something bold (shows leadership qualities). I like the other guys idea as well…to draw a dot and call it a scale-model. Not everyone could pull this off, you need to be very careful not to seem cocky, but in the end I think ingenuity would be appreciated more than blind submission to unusual questioning. If nothing else it will make you stand out, and that is almost never a bad thing…well, you might want to keep your clothes on though.

As to the above post about you seeming smug…that might be the case, only you and the interviewer know. I agree that specifically stating “Are there any questions you’d like to ask me?” seems a little presumptuous. It’s as if you’re saying “I’m here to interview, so you should be asking me questions and I should be answering them.” It all depends on how you say this though….if the conversation were winding down, and you were both communicating jovially, I wouldn’t see this as being a problem if stated more like “So do you see anything on my application that concerns you?” or simply “Would you like me to clarify anything about my application or experiences?” That way you are trying to bring the focus back to yourself without actually putting yourself on the spot…after all, your application is your proxy-self >). The other thing you can do is ask him more questions…but not about his research. Ask instead about his views on physicians, healthcare, the school, the city, etc. That brings the conversation back to what you really should be talking about, and if you are a good conversationalist you will use what he’s saying to interject your own agreements, disagreements, opinions, and other thoughts. If he’s not willing to take the lead in the interview then you should. At least this way you have the opportunity to direct the conversation to topics you feel more comfortable with.

Just some examples of this…”So, what would you say made you want to become a doctor the most?” (gives you a chance to say why you want to be a doctor as well, just add “I completely understand that…I would have to say that for me it’s because…..)

“In your experiences as a physician what would you say is the number one problem you’ve encountered with our healthcare system?” (I would stick to whatever answer he gives, but you can interject your own opinion on why you agree with him, and then phrase whatever you think the biggest problem is by adding “….but what do you think about xxxxxx issue?”)

All in all….if he wants to talk, then by all means let him talk!! Show your interest by actively participating in the conversation and asking him clarifying questions (this is rule number 1 in customer service training). Finally, realize that as a physician he has encountered 100x what you have, and he has a ton of things that you really would like his opinion or viewpoint on…take advantage of that!
 
I just got back from my interview at Texas Tech. My first interviewer didn't seem to want to talk about me as an applicant, rather he kept on talking about his own research, after which we talked about experiemental treatment on AIDS.

So I finally ask him, "Are there any questions you'd like to ask me?"

"Well, there doesn't seem to be anything wrong with your applicantion...Oh wait, I have a question for you."

*takes out a pen and paper*

"Draw an amino acid for me."

WHAT!?

"Okay...um..I suppose I'll attempt to draw the simplest one..."

So I drew glycine and got it right. Unfortunately, he didn't like that it took me so long to draw it. He goes on to say that I'm suppose to know stuff like this.

Next time my interviewer goes off topic, I think I'm just going to let him be...

I guess no one's ever told you the greatest sound to a person's ears is his own voice. At least you now know to sit there and feign interest at future interviews.
 
^ It's also the person's name, according to Dale Carnegie... :laugh:
 
^ It's also the person's name, according to Dale Carnegie... :laugh:

That too. I've learned that a good trick to get a person to think a conversation is going well is to talk all about that person. But of course, that doesn't mean you should answer your interviewer's questions with, "Well, what do you think?" when he really wants to know what you think.
 
if the interviewer goes off topic, it's to test you. they want to see if you change when you are asked something different from what you expect. you can never prepare to be asked to draw an amino acid. but you know theyre going to ask why you want to go to medical school. so they can observe your reaction when youre asked something weird. it's all part of the interview.

so the problem would be if you get all flustered when they ask you to draw an amino acid. or try to change the topic to something expected. if you dont know how to draw it say you dont know. pretending to know is worse because then youre a bullshi**er. or showing arrogance is not good either. act normal no matter what question comes flying at you.
 
Good Lord, when I was interviewing for medical school many, many moons ago I was extremely glad that most of my interviewers went off topic and talked about other things besides my application, medicine, diver$ity (it should be a bad word), and all kinds of stupid "If you were a tree" questions. I had a very nice discussion about the merits of various military rifles with one of my interviewers and at another was pleased that I was a Republican and we spent the half an hour talking about how idiotic liberals were.
 
FWIW, this is a rookie mistake. The absolute BEST interview is one that isn't an interview at all, it is a conversation. You should not have tried so hard to make it into an interview, and gotten out of there while you were ahead.

Because this is an interview for medical schools and not jobs I may be wrong, but.... I had an "interview" at a large hedge fund that I really wanted to work for and the whole thing turned out to be a conversation. I had something on my resume about a snowboarding organization that I used to be an officer in and he began talking about how he owned a large stake in this snowboard company back in the day, blah blah blah. Anyways we got way off topic and didn't talk about finance at all. I never got the job even though I thought we both seemed interested in conversing with eachother. There were probably other qualified applicants (and theres a chance they even closed the job without hiring people because they don't employ many in total), but I just cant help but think that it would have gone better if I was able to actually show him how I was capable of being an analyst at his hedge fund based on my prior experience rather than talking about snowboarding.
 
pkboi - I think whether or not you made a mistake all depends on how you said it. If it had even a touch of sarcasm..maybe not good. But if you said it in a genuine fashion, then I'd say you did nothing wrong and have a good shot at acceptance. You can't tell how a person reacts to someone just from reading the conversation relayed on sdn. Interaction is a lot more complicated than that.

Besides, I highly doubt youre the only interviewee that guy asked to draw an amino acid.

How fun would it be to be an interviewer. I think I'd take all kind of liberties and try to chop it up about the randomest stuff possible just to freak the ocd pre-meds out. So, what do you think about Angelina and Brad? How do you feel about parking meters? etc.😉
 
if they go off-topic....you follow them. I was having a hard time connecting with my interviewer (an elderly retired surgeon), and we ended up discussing my undergrad's success in college basketball. I have no idea how we got there, but once we did, I felt like the ice had been broken and the rest of the interview felt pretty smooth. He had kinda grilled me on a few questions at first that left me gritting my teeth (such as, "why were your grades so low in fall '04 when they were so good your fresh/soph years?" even though they weren't very low - a 3.5!)
 
Because this is an interview for medical schools and not jobs I may be wrong, but.... I had an "interview" at a large hedge fund that I really wanted to work for and the whole thing turned out to be a conversation. I had something on my resume about a snowboarding organization that I used to be an officer in and he began talking about how he owned a large stake in this snowboard company back in the day, blah blah blah. Anyways we got way off topic and didn't talk about finance at all. I never got the job even though I thought we both seemed interested in conversing with eachother. There were probably other qualified applicants (and theres a chance they even closed the job without hiring people because they don't employ many in total), but I just cant help but think that it would have gone better if I was able to actually show him how I was capable of being an analyst at his hedge fund based on my prior experience rather than talking about snowboarding.

I cannot comment on your described situation but know that my best and most successful job and med school interviews were pure off topic conversations with no mention of the real reason I was there. If you get the opportunity to get on a topic the interviewer seems passionate about, and eager to talk about, just run with it.
 
if they go off-topic....you follow them. I was having a hard time connecting with my interviewer (an elderly retired surgeon), and we ended up discussing my undergrad's success in college basketball. I have no idea how we got there, but once we did, I felt like the ice had been broken and the rest of the interview felt pretty smooth. He had kinda grilled me on a few questions at first that left me gritting my teeth (such as, "why were your grades so low in fall '04 when they were so good your fresh/soph years?" even though they weren't very low - a 3.5!)

When he asked you about your grades how did you respond to that?
 
When he asked you about your grades how did you respond to that?

A backslap to the face and a change of subject. That's how you roll at this level.
 
Bingo. Personally, I'd be very happy to have an interview where the interviewer felt at ease with me to talk at length about him/herself. I get credit for showing up, s/he gets to talk about...whatever, and at the end, there are no sour feelings.

Agreed with this post full heartedly. I know here at USF they have closed file interviews. But though they don't advertise it, I am under the impression that they secretly pair you up with someone who has similar interests or a similar background to what you have presented on paper. So the majority of the interview cases I've heard have been conversational about you as a person and about things like research if you done some or volunteering or if you played a sport they'll talk about sports with you.

For instance, one girl I know went on a med mission trip and was interested in community health so the interviews she was paired up with were people involved in community out reach clinics and hence that's what they really talked about most of the interview. It was not a formal job type of interview where there are only Q and A about you specifically but rather a discussion between the two.
 
Pkboi24 you're answer to the question is right here... He didn't ask you to draw the Amino Acid because he was testing you... He was responding to your rude manner... I don't even have to ask if you came off "smug" when saying, "So I finally ask him, "Are there any questions you'd like to ask me?"

YOU did and he effectivley took your application and threw it into the garbage... The Amino acid was just his way of saying, " you think you're so good and smart that you dont' even have to participate in intellectual conversation, then do me a favor and show me how smart you are and draw something as simple as an Amino Acid... which I would have gotten wrong because what if I didn't take that class as of yet??? So I think the question was just ******ed... "

Listen, When in Rome do as the Romans do... not as the Turks or Eskimos if you know what I mean....

It is OK because at least you got an interview. work on your humility and interests.

I was not the least bit rude. You had to be there. The conversation was winding down and I just threw it in there since most interviewers end up asking me if I have any more questions for them. We had a good bit of intellectual conversation and I think the interview went well. I was just thrown off by the technical question.
 
I was not the least bit rude. You had to be there. The conversation was winding down and I just threw it in there since most interviewers end up asking me if I have any more questions for them. We had a good bit of intellectual conversation and I think the interview went well. I was just thrown off by the technical question.

I still think that's an unusual question for interviewers to hear. I'd avoid posing this question at future interviews, since I think the interviewers know exactly what they want to get to know about you. I could be wrong, but that's my $.02.
 
Not to beat a dead horse, but that's similar to what I was thinking when I read the OP's OP. I was thinking more like, "What was he thinking asking something like that?"

Looks like non-trads rule the interview phase :laugh:
 
A backslap to the face and a change of subject. That's how you roll at this level.

LOL, because I would want to know what a 3.5 semester is so bad... its like a B A A A- A- and that can't be a bad semester. can it?
 
I think interviewing is kind of like being a politician. You have set talking points ready to roll out. Some inexperienced politicians make so many gaffs they will never win but then the career ones that everyone hates does them in their sleep and wins.
 
to the OP: maybe the interviewer wanted to see your reaction---maybe similar to stress interviews.
 
Top