Filibuster? Why would I want to do that when it is clear that I make my points clearly, clearly avoiding filibusters, which clearly are counterproductive, not to mention long and drawn out, which brings me back to the point of how points should be made clearly, therefore clearly I do not filibuster in any shape or form, but sometimes it is clearly hard to differentiate between good conversation and dialogue versus a filibuster, which I have really never had much practice at doing but I am sure that it has its role in everyday life as a way to make sure that all points are covered, clearly, therefore I clearly am not someone who filibusters his points and clearly you should know that good chiefs never use that tactic to attract attention much less recruit prospective medical students, so I think that this is clearly a point that I have already made with some . . . clarity and I think that the point of a filibuster should never be brought up again . . . unless you clearly think it has to.