- Joined
- Jul 28, 2015
- Messages
- 128
- Reaction score
- 159
Hi guys, I'm getting all turned around in my logic and could use some insight.
My MCAT prep book says that a C-N bond is stronger than a C-O bond, and uses this as a reason why when an amide is under nucleophilic attack, the O is the leaving group.
It makes sense to me that N would bond to C better than O, because O is more electronegative and thus wouldn't want share it's electrons as well, weakening the bond.
But then why does C-O have a greater bond energy than C-N?
What am I misunderstandinggggg. Thanks.
My MCAT prep book says that a C-N bond is stronger than a C-O bond, and uses this as a reason why when an amide is under nucleophilic attack, the O is the leaving group.
It makes sense to me that N would bond to C better than O, because O is more electronegative and thus wouldn't want share it's electrons as well, weakening the bond.
But then why does C-O have a greater bond energy than C-N?
What am I misunderstandinggggg. Thanks.