- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 273
- Reaction score
- 16
Where do you like to read the news?
The media is inherently biased, so I go with Colbert and Stewart to get opposing views on issues.
you guys are all wrong... www.espn.com
The media is inherently biased, so I go with Colbert and Stewart to get opposing views on issues.
You're joking, right? Sarcasm is sometimes difficult to detect on the nets.
You're joking, right? Sarcasm is sometimes difficult to detect on the nets.
I also lean to the right, but I watch CNN because they are the worst at disguising their bias.
Seriously? Have you seen Fox? Hannity? Glenn Beck?
Hannity and Beck are political commentators. Its their job to give their biased opinions. I don't give a F#*$ about opinions, I just want to know what is going on in the world.Seriously? Have you seen Fox? Hannity? Glenn Beck?
Seriously? Have you seen Fox? Hannity? Glenn Beck?
Yeah, at least MSNBC doesn't try to brand themselves as unbiased.
Fox News: "Fair and Balanced" 😆
Fox News isn't nearly as bad as MSNBC or CNN especially when you are watching the news portions (Baier, Shep Smith...) not the commentary (O'Reilly, Hannity, Beck).
what, no one for NPR?
NPR and PRI for me when im driving..
and democracy now! i find it to be the least biased 🙂
Really?
(Try to ignore that this link comes from the Huffington Post. The actual video is from Fox News.)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/...us-fo_n_327140.html?slidenumber=7#slide_image
You're right, but I'd still contend Fox News isn't as bad as MSNBC or CNN.
http://www.tinyurl.com/yhkg7vs
MSNBC
http://tinyurl.com/ylfyc42
CNN
(Try to ignore that the links comes from Newsbusters. The actual content is from MSNBC and CNN.)
BTW lets not forget the classy way CNN (Rick Sanchez aka DWI Murderer) and MSNBC (Schuster) posted fictitious and unsubstantiated quotes attributed to Limbaugh with out fact checking them first. Also, if you need to see any bias just take a look at the Acorn scandal coverage.
Agreed, CNN and MSNBC slant to the left, Fox slants to the right.
I'm not trying to say that CNN or MSNBC are any more objective or credible than Fox.
The difference, however, is in how the networks try to brand themselves.
Fox News' trademark slogan of "Fair and Balanced" laughable. That's all I'm saying.
Yeah, they are all slanted and its unfortunate that there isn't an objective cable news station.
Though regarding the Fox slogan, I don't think CNN or MSNBC advertise or have a slogan proclaiming their left wing slant. I mean CNN says its the "Most Trusted Name in News" and MSNBC "America's Fastest Growing News Channel." Obviously MSNBC is not the fastest growing because Fox is, and if CNN were the most trusted it would have more viewers than Fox.
Even if CNN was the most trusted, assuming that everyone would watch, that would assume that everyone is rational. The Econ major in me says this is true. However, experience tells me differently.
Yeah, they are all slanted and its unfortunate that there isn't an objective cable news station.
Though regarding the Fox slogan, I don't think CNN or MSNBC advertise or have a slogan proclaiming their left wing slant. I mean CNN says its the "Most Trusted Name in News" and MSNBC "America's Fastest Growing News Channel." Obviously MSNBC is not the fastest growing because Fox is, and if CNN were the most trusted it would have more viewers than Fox.
Sarcasm people.
rachel maddow show, TIME magazine, CNN reporter michael ware, and...
BILL MAHER
PBS and NPR are pretty good sources. Its nice knowing they can't be swayed by corporations.
Most of my news I get from FARK.com.
Good site. All the readers submit any random/amusing/breaking news stories they find on other sites, so you never miss anything important. Likewise, next to every news link is a comments page that usually goes into the hundreds. Now days I can't stand reading or hearing a story and not seeing what everyone else thinks about it.
When I heard "Balloon boy lost in Colorado!!" I immediatly went to Fark and read the stories comments. After 50 or so people posted, a physics professor posted specifying the lifting quality of helium and used the CNN released dimensions on the balloon... he proved on the spot that the balloon could not reach those altitudes if the kid was actually in it. Everyone on Fark knew it was a hoax half a day before it was confirmed![]()