- Joined
- Mar 22, 2008
- Messages
- 67
- Reaction score
- 0
so, here is the scenario, who would have better chances at a good position:
candidate #1)
average boards
avg grades
avg letters
avg 3rd year
...basically all avg med student
candidate #2)
above average scores, except one failure 2nd year (with remediation)
kills the step 1 (lets say 240+)
3rd year with excellent scores.
who is better off and how much better off? who would you rather be
candidate #1)
average boards
avg grades
avg letters
avg 3rd year
...basically all avg med student
candidate #2)
above average scores, except one failure 2nd year (with remediation)
kills the step 1 (lets say 240+)
3rd year with excellent scores.
who is better off and how much better off? who would you rather be