- Joined
- Jun 20, 2010
- Messages
- 293
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Pharmacy Student
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Ok I know what you're thinking, but this is not a troll post.
I'm a Canadian and hopefully will be a pharmacy student soon. This past year I've been doing a lot of reading up on pharmacy, especially here on SDN. Now this might just be me but I've found that no matter where pharmacists work, whether it is the U.S., Canada, UK, or Australia, they always face a threat to their profession but they are never able to mount an adequate response.
In the U.S. it's the opening of too many schools and creating a glut of pharmacists with poor job opportunities. In Canada, it's the government always making cuts to pharmacy and lowering reimbursement. I've been doing some reading on the situation in Australia and they face the same problems as the U.S., with too many schools pumping out too many graduates.
What I don't understand is why is it always pharmacy? Other health professionals are able to better protect their professions, especially in the eyes of the public but pharmacists always seem to get attacked and they never fight back.
At first when I noticed the issue, I thought it was just a Canadian problem, where Pharmacists are simply not organized enough to fight back when the government decides to make cuts to save money but after reading numerous threads on SDN and other websites I've found that this is a problem around the world.
So what makes Pharmacists such pushovers? Is it an inherent quality of the profession? Is it just the type of people that the profession attracts? Or is it something else?
Again, I mean no disrespect. I want to be a pharmacist and I want to be an advocate for the the profession and that's why its so important for me to understand this issue.
I'm a Canadian and hopefully will be a pharmacy student soon. This past year I've been doing a lot of reading up on pharmacy, especially here on SDN. Now this might just be me but I've found that no matter where pharmacists work, whether it is the U.S., Canada, UK, or Australia, they always face a threat to their profession but they are never able to mount an adequate response.
In the U.S. it's the opening of too many schools and creating a glut of pharmacists with poor job opportunities. In Canada, it's the government always making cuts to pharmacy and lowering reimbursement. I've been doing some reading on the situation in Australia and they face the same problems as the U.S., with too many schools pumping out too many graduates.
What I don't understand is why is it always pharmacy? Other health professionals are able to better protect their professions, especially in the eyes of the public but pharmacists always seem to get attacked and they never fight back.
At first when I noticed the issue, I thought it was just a Canadian problem, where Pharmacists are simply not organized enough to fight back when the government decides to make cuts to save money but after reading numerous threads on SDN and other websites I've found that this is a problem around the world.
So what makes Pharmacists such pushovers? Is it an inherent quality of the profession? Is it just the type of people that the profession attracts? Or is it something else?
Again, I mean no disrespect. I want to be a pharmacist and I want to be an advocate for the the profession and that's why its so important for me to understand this issue.