just a huge waste of time and money to travel to schools for interviews.
just a huge waste of time and money to travel to schools for interviews.
just a huge waste of time and money to travel to schools for interviews.
just a huge waste of time and money to travel to schools for interviews.
Would you accept a marriage proposal from someone you've never met in person?
Would you accept a marriage proposal from someone you've never met in person?
Russian bride services don't have a problem with that. 😀
It would all be much easier if my idea of teleportation were to be true.
yeah, why cant we just download each schools financial aid powerpoint presentation and figure it out ourselves, have virtual tours of the campus and clinic, meet the faculty and students through facebook/myspace, get a feeling of the school and surrounding area vicariously through some student you've never met, and be forced to make the decision of where to spend the next 4 years of our lives and upwards of $80,000 of student loans on a place we've never visited. that would save us so much money on traveling expenses.
Would you accept a marriage proposal from someone you've never met in person?
yeah, why cant we just download each schools financial aid powerpoint presentation and figure it out ourselves, have virtual tours of the campus and clinic, meet the faculty and students through facebook/myspace, get a feeling of the school and surrounding area vicariously through some student you've never met, and be forced to make the decision of where to spend the next 4 years of our lives and upwards of $80,000 of student loans on a place we've never visited. that would save us so much money on traveling expenses.
Exactly. I would so attend this school.
You don't pick up sarcasm well, hey?
To be honest, it seems to be more of a personal matter for people to visit schools.
How different will a grad school look or feel relative to your friendly undergraduate school?
There should atleast be an option for video-conferencing. As long as it does not overshadow the interest of an applicant for the school.
Not to mention, it would save the school some $ aswell.
just a huge waste of time and money to travel to schools for interviews.
The schools want to make sure you don't have B.O.
first of all, its "eh"
second, i realized it was sarcasm after reading the first word of that paragraph lol.
.well hell you are going to be 200,000+ in debt when you graduate school .
200,000+ !!! I don't think so! Knock that 200 in half, you're scaring me.
Well, count your tuition, living expenses, other misc expenses...its 50K a year just about, times 4 years...thats 200K...now if your parents help you out you're in better shape...but if you're paying for it all yourself in loans...add interest, yea its 200K in debt when you graduate. Cost of equipment is included in that (which as a student u get discounts so utilize it). Anywho, yea you should know what your getting into money wise...its really OK if you are willing to do it and you want to do it...but if you're just in it because "you think you might like it" think again. Its a good career, but its what you make of it...some people drop out because they decide they don't like it. In that respect I think experience is key prior to entering school...esp if its such a big investment. Its like buying a house though, you going to school more appreciates your value and the amount of money you are capable of making just comparing that to someone with an undergrad degree, on averege you will make more. Its just something to think about, a reality, but not something you should freak out about if you know this is what you want to do. I dont think anything of it...its worth it to me.
Do they at least give you free contacts and I also need new new glasses, both frames and lenses!?
here we get free contacts, and pay cost for frames/lenses.
thats exactly what i was thinkingwhere is "here"?
Oh, and in your response to "its such a waste of money" to meet in person....well hell you are going to be 200,000+ in debt when you graduate school whats a couple hundred to travel to get in...seriously.
as long as the school is accredited, there should be nothing else of concern.
its not so much about the money, rather the time invested.
No one has provided a solid reason as to why e-interviews would be a bad idea.
as long as the school is accredited, there should be nothing else of concern.
its not so much about the money, rather the time invested.
No one has provided a solid reason as to why e-interviews would be a bad idea.
200,000+ !!! I don't think so! Knock that 200 in half, you're scaring me.
Okay, so say you do have a video interview or phone interview. And then, hypothetically, the school in question accepts you based on said interview and you decide to attend that school. What guarantee is there that you will actually like the campus and the environment - ei. people, location, facilities, faculty, clinic, program? And if you don't like those things about the school, wouldn't you want to transfer to a different school/program? Maybe you didnt like the particular program so much so that you decided to drop out and actually rethink going into optometry?
Now from the school's prospective, why would they want to risk their income on someone who is rogue enough to not visit the school and do research (by research i mean traveling to the school, taking a tour and investigating the campus, students and faculty), while running the risk that they will enroll and later decide to drop out? if a student drops out, then the school looses that student's tuition money, and thus, the school loses out on income.
Youre thinking about video interviewing with a rather selfish motive, but in reality, interview day is to make sure that the both the admissions committee likes the potential student, as well as the student likes the school. This best done in a face to face interview and school tour.
if the admissions comittee does invite you to an interview, then already you have met the requirements. there should be really nothing else to do beyond this point besides attending the interview which can be done through the web.
wow, did you even attempt to read my post?
if the admissions comittee does invite you to an interview, then already you have met the requirements. there should be really nothing else to do beyond this point besides attending the interview which can be done through the web.
surprisingly, the tuition argument is a good point, but I highly doubt an interviewer can determine a students future events\troubles\issues etc.
Thats not true at all. I read your posts, and it seems like you have no idea how the admissions process works for optometry school. Do you have any experience with the interview process? You have not met all of the requirements when you have been extended an interview. The interview itself is a large portion of the admissions process. Additionally, many schools have interview day essays - how can that be done over the internet?
You still havent provided a good answer to my question: how can the school and the potential student know that they are a good fit for each other unless the student does a face to face interview and tour of the campus?
Well, you're not going to be at school 100% of the time.
Half the time, you'll be off campus- how can you gauge the environment without visiting the area?
If the interview process is so relevant because it's a large portion of the interview process, then how do you explain the students who get into the respective schools w/o attending an interview? If the interview was such a big deal, then it should be mandatory for all applicants.
To answer your question, I guess the only way to know your compatibilty with the school and vice-versa, is if you visit and spend some time with the school/faculty. However, that is completely pointless. Did you interview or even take a tour or talk with faculty at your undergraduate school? No.
Everything and anything else, pertaining to the school, is of personal preference which can be dissected just by reasearching or talking to class mates. However irrelavant, a visit to the school or talking to faculty/students etc. will produce similar conclusions/answers about the school enviorment/ppl etc, which you can obtain easily by researching.
If the interview process is so relevant because it's a large portion of the interview process, then how do you explain the students who get into the respective schools w/o attending an interview? If the interview was such a big deal, then it should be mandatory for all applicants.
To answer your question, I guess the only way to know your compatibilty with the school and vice-versa, is if you visit and spend some time with the school/faculty. However, that is completely pointless. Did you interview or even take a tour or talk with faculty at your undergraduate school? No.
All optometry schools have one solid objective, which is to educate their students. Everything and anything else, pertaining to the school, is of personal preference which can be dissected just by reasearching or talking to class mates. However irrelavant, a visit to the school or talking to faculty/students etc. will produce similar conclusions/answers about the school enviorment/ppl etc, which you can obtain easily by researching.
Judging from my interview experience at ICO, PCO, SCO, NOVA and Berkeley, that is not true for me and im guessing 99% of the other applicants.
Are you the sort of guy that would buy a car without test driving it? Because you can just do research online, and talk to people who have driven it before to learn about it. What happens if that new drivers seat just doesnt fit you - just doesnt provide you with any back support?
Unlike my car analogy, you cant have tuition money returned to you and there is no warranty if something at the school doesnt work for you once you get there.
thats exactly what i was thinking
Unless all schools do not clearly enforce reasons like you guys have, however common they may be, then the notion that interviews are pointless is still probable.
Compatibilty with the school is a personal preference, which should only matter if you treat it as an important factor. For me, I really dont care where I spend 4 years while completing a degree, as long as it is not crapy NOVA.
Ha, there is no way an Optometry school can produce a good or bad OD. That depends on the person and his/her circumstances. And so what if they managed to produce a bad OD? Not like we are paying them to enhance our skills/personality etc. Schools could care less about what type of OD you become.
For you who have been to interviews, how long did the actual 1on1 interview take?
Thats not true...schools do care about what type of OD you become because you are going to represent optometry as a whole profession and a "bad egg" can reflect on the image of the whole profession. Don't think of optometry as each individual, esp when we are trying so hard to be recognized for our abilities and expand our scope of practice. Actually we took a class about this last semester, in addition to classes to help re-enforce the doctor/patient relationship. To some it is more natural to be empathic and be a good doctor, and to others they have to work at it. Judging from your attitude, you need to work on it.
😕
need work on what?
Understanding other people. And, apparently, reading.